Is There a Way to Create Non-Flammable Fireworks?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the challenge of creating non-flammable alternatives to traditional fireworks that maintain the visual spectacle without the associated risks of ash and fire hazards. Participants are encouraged to propose innovative solutions that not only replicate the colorful displays but also enhance safety features, such as improved ignition timing, surface-to-air delivery methods, and noise reduction. Suggestions include the use of technology like computerized simulations and alternative entertainment options, acknowledging that some individuals enjoy the thrill of launching fireworks as much as the visual experience. The conversation highlights the need for advancements in safety and environmental considerations in pyrotechnics.
NotAChemist
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
With so many advances in technology and science, I find it difficult to believe that no one has cracked the code on non-flammable 'fireworks'-- something that still gives us the same bang for our buck without the ash and firestarters falling back to the earth. So, here's a challenge: Present an alternative that prevents wildfires, but still gives us the colorful and bright presentation of fireworks. Bonus points for a better method of timing the ignition, surface to air delivery, noise reduction and any other safety factors. Go!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
A tv might do. Some people enjoy shooting fireworks more than watching (the risk is thrilling).
 
Computerized simulations of fireworks
 
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top