Is There a Way to Regularize Euler Products on Primes?

mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
although is not valid in general (since an Euler product usually converges only when Re(s) >1)

\frac{ d \zeta(1/2)}{\zeta (1/2)}= -\sum_{p} log(p)(1-p^{1/2}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, this is simply by taking logarithms on either side of the Euler product representation to get,

\log{\zeta(s)} = -\sum_{p} \log{(1 - p^{-s})}

where p[/tex] is the set of primes.<br /> Differentiating then gives,<br /> <br /> \frac{\zeta&amp;#039;(s)}{\zeta(s)} = -\sum_{p} (p^{s} - 1)^{-1} \log{p}<br /> <br /> This gives the zeta-regularized sum (and hence product) on primes (which looks curious as it is, unless special values of s[/tex] are used), but generally its more convenient to consider,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; \prod_{n} \lambda_{n} = \exp{-\zeta_{\lambda}&amp;amp;#039;(0)}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; for a zeta function defined on a sequence (\lambda_{n})_{n \geq 1}[/tex].&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; If its a prime regularization you&amp;amp;#039;re after, look for this paper by Munoz Garcia and Perez Marco called &amp;amp;#039;Super Regularization of Infinite Products&amp;amp;#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Never mind, here&amp;amp;#039;s the link to the preprint pdf-&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; http://inc.web.ihes.fr/prepub/PREPRINTS/M03/M03-52.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top