Is There an Anti-Universe and Do Antimatter Particles Effect Themselves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chuckosity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
chuckosity
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Here are several perplexing questions that i have been pondering recently and i really don't know who I would ask this so I am just asking everywhere. since every action has an equal and opposite reaction is there an anti-universe does gravity effect itself? is there anti gravity? do antimatter particles effect itself by destroying itself into nothing? do massless particles exist an do they effect each other gravitation wise?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is an "anti-universe" ? Is that something you just dreamed up?
 
ya but think about it if every action has an equal and opposite action wouldn't the creation of matter have to have a opposite reaction?
 
chuckosity said:
ya but think about it if every action has an equal and opposite action wouldn't the creation of matter have to have a opposite reaction?

Welcome to PhysicsForums, chuckosity!

You have a good question, and I have often wondered the same thing (just the part about an anti-universe). I actually think it is "possible". This is what is often called an "ad hoc" hypothesis. Which is to say we dream it up knowing there is no real way to check it out.

There is no fundamental difference between matter and anti-matter. You could call our universe "anti-matter" and there would be no meaningful difference in what we would witness in experiments. It is *possible* that the big bang created both a universe and an anti-universe. Were that the case, each would go a different direction in time. However, this idea is completely speculative and we have no way to verify the idea. As such, that essentially puts it outside the realm of normal science.

As to particles and anti-particles destroying themselves into nothing: there IS something that results, and that is energy. Energy is conserved. Also: Massless particles DO have a connection to the gravitational field. Good questions, you should keep reading about this and learn more.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top