Is there an easier way to solve for theta in this equilibrium problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantum_enhan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for theta in an equilibrium problem involving a stretched length and forces. The equation derived is sin(theta)(sec(theta) - 1) = 0.25, which complicates the solution process. Participants suggest using the substitution t = tan(theta/2) to simplify the calculations. There is some confusion regarding the relationship between sin(theta) and tan(theta/2), but the conversation encourages building upon the identities to find a solution. Overall, the thread seeks a more straightforward method to solve for theta amidst complex trigonometric relationships.
quantum_enhan
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


null.jpg




The Attempt at a Solution


2Fsin(theta)=45 N

Where F=ks=(75N/m)(s-1.2m).

Looking at the triangle, we can state that s, the stretched length is equal to 1.2m/cos(theta). Therefore,

2(75N/m)[(1.2m/cos(theta))-1.2m]sin(theta)=45 N
sin(theta)[(1/cos(theta))-1]=0.25

From here, the math gets tricky and complicated for me. Is there any easier way to solve theta?:S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi quantum_enhan! :smile:

(have a theta: θ :wink:)
quantum_enhan said:
sin(theta)[(1/cos(theta))-1]=0.25

From here, the math gets tricky and complicated for me. Is there any easier way to solve theta?:S

You have sinθ(secθ - 1) = 0.25.

Try substituting t = tan(θ/2). :wink:
 
I don't see how you can get tan(θ/2) from sinθ(secθ - 1). Don't you need (1-cosθ)/sinθ. I can't seem to get it to equal the half angle identity..
 
You can get sinθ from tan(θ/2), and you can get cosθ from tan(θ/2) …

so just build it up! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top