Is there an equation for horsepower?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kriegera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Horsepower
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the horsepower developed by a Niagara turbine using 172,000 cubic feet of water per minute at a height of 215 feet. The initial formula presented involves converting the water flow to pounds per minute and applying a standard equation that includes the factor of 33,000, which is questioned for its relevance. Various calculations yield horsepower values around 69,900 HP, depending on the conversion methods and significant figures used. The importance of maintaining significant figures in calculations is emphasized to ensure accuracy. Ultimately, the consensus is that the horsepower values are consistent across different methods when significant figures are properly considered.
kriegera
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


One of the Niagara turbines uses 172,000 cubic feet of water per minute under a head of 215 ft. What is the horsepower developed?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Below is "research findings" and attempt at a solution but I'm a little leary of the 33,000. Can anyone give me some insight if you've done a similar problem.

The total horsepower developed by water falling from a given height is the product of the mass flow rate in pounds per minute times the falling height in feet divided by 33,000. It can be expressed as:
Php = mmin h g / 33000
where
Php = power (horsepower, hp)
mmin = mass flow rate per minute (lbm/min)
h = head or height (ft)
g = acceleration of gravity (9.8)
Convert 172,000 cubic feet of water per minute to pounds per minute: A cubic foot of air is approximately 0.0807 lbs  (172,000)(0.0807)=13880.4 lb/minute
Php = (13,880.4)(215)(9.8) / 33000= 8,862.42 hp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is this 33,000 number you're using? Considering there are cars with engines with a power rating in excess of 1,000 hp, 8,800 hp is obviously way way off.
 
Pengwuino said:
What is this 33,000 number you're using? Considering there are cars with engines with a power rating in excess of 1,000 hp, 8,800 hp is obviously way way off.

that was a tip equation i got from someone else but they couldn't identify what the 33,000 was which is why I'm skeptical...So -
There are 172,000 cubic ft. of water and
1 cubic feet of water=28.32 kg(approximately)
AND
215 feet = 65.532 meters
power=work/time=mgh/time=(172,000)(28.32)(9.8)(65.532)/60=52,137,468.90watt

Is this better? How do you convert to horsepower? I've seen two methods:

52137468.90/746=69889.36 Horsepower.
OR
(52137468.90)(.00134)=69864.21 Hp

however, i tested it with an online unit converter and it gave a third answer: 69917.4974904738

very confused!
 
Every answer is about the same, it just depends on how many units you keep. The conversion from horsepower to watts is exact so when you do your calculation, keep as many significant figures as possible. In your question, however, you have 3 significant figures so when you have your answer, it's accurate to 3 significant figures. So as you can see, all 3 answers are 69,900 HP.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top