I Does Anti-Information Exist in Quantum Theory?

Jason White
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
Is there any theory that says anti-information exists?

If there is anti-matter, would that matter carry information to annihilate the regular matter's information saying its a certain type of matter and turn it into energy? Could anti-matter just be regular matter with anti-information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Jason White said:
Is there any theory that says anti-information exists?

If there is anti-matter, would that matter carry information to annihilate the regular matter's information saying its a certain type of matter and turn it into energy? Could anti-matter just be regular matter with anti-information.

As you said, the matter/antimatter annihilation event releases energy in the form of photons. That energy contains information, so the information is not lost.

Here is a past PF discussion pertaining to that.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/matter-antimatter-annihilation.224821/

But I'm sympathetic to your curiosity. There have been famous debates within the physics community about whether information can be lost through black holes (Hawking vs Susskind). Ultimately, it seems that information is a (the?) fundamental physical property that is always conserved.

I'm not even sure how you would define the concept of "anti-information". It would seem to me that it would simply refer to a lack of information regarding any objective entity/parameter. When you think about it, all physical observables and/or parameters are really information... position, momentum, mass, charge, color, spin, etc... all information about the physical state. But regardless of form, once information exists, it exists. You can't go back. You might look into the concepts of Von Neumann entropy and Shannon entropy.

There's a well known math/physics theorem originally derived by Emmy Noether (not surprisingly called Noether's Theorem) that relates conserved properties to fundamental symmetries. I've always been curious about what symmetry might be reflected by the conservation of information.
 
Last edited:
Do you know AK Pati's No hiding theorem?:

"Can we hide quantum information in same way like
classical information?
No. If the original information is missing then it must
move to somewhere else and it cannot be hidden in
the correlations between a pair of systems.
This we call the ‘no-hiding theorem’ (Braunstein and
Pati, PRL, 2007)."
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top