Is there any exp. evid that massless photons cuves spacetime?

ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
Is there any experimental or observationa evidence that massless photons warp spacetime?

Of course I know that in GR everything that has energy curves spacetime, including massless particles, but what-if this is wrong, and that particles must have mass to act as a "charge" for gravity? what if we modify gravity so that massless particles have no effect on spacetime itself. (but can be themselves affected by curved spacetime)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ensabah6 said:
Is there any experimental or observationa evidence that massless photons warp spacetime?

Of course I know that in GR everything that has energy curves spacetime, including massless particles, but what-if this is wrong, and that particles must have mass to act as a "charge" for gravity? what if we modify gravity so that massless particles have no effect on spacetime itself. (but can be themselves affected by curved spacetime)
In that case we have to look for a better theory. :smile:
 
I don't believe there is experimental evidence for anything curving spacetime...it's a mathematical model. Nobody even knows what spacetime is.

We do know light moves in a curved trajectory when passing the sun...that's been observed...but is that a "force" or curvature of spacetime...no way to prove one way or the other as far as I know. What has been proven is that general relativity works, is more accurate than Newtonian formulations, but does not work near extremes of curvature/energy...that is near singularities...
 
The solar deflection of light is some evidence for it. This is usually thought of as curvature affecting light, rather than light affecting curvature. However, the geodesic motion of free particles and photons doesn't have to postulated separately, and can be derived from Einstein's field equation that says that light curves spacetime.

For comparison, there is actually a consistent relativistic theory that says that gravity is the curvature of spacetime, but light does not contribute to the curvature. This theory predicts no global bending of light.

Another place to look is the standard model of cosmology. The model uses Einstein's field equation to postulates a certain relationship between matter and spacetime curvature. In the model, the matter at a certain era is radiation dominated, during which nucleosynthesis and helium formation occurred. To the extent that this model gives a good fit to present data, it is consistent with light causing spacetime curvature.
 
Naty1 said:
I don't believe there is experimental evidence for anything curving spacetime...it's a mathematical model.
This is incorrect, or at least a mischaracterization. Curved spacetime is part of a physical theory not just a mathematical model. As such it makes concrete testable predictions, many of which have been verified experimentally and thus relate the mathematical model to physical reality.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top