Is there any learning group for QFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xiaomin Chu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Qft
Xiaomin Chu
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Want to learn QFT but often lose courage when seeing such a huge book(M. Srednicki). The author also suggests learn with someone else. Is there any group for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, you mean online? I'm quite sure you find someone here that's in the same position with you: learning QFT outside university enrollment.
 
You're certainly welcome to post questions in this forum as you proceed through the book. You probably won't get the same people responding every time, but you won't have to depend on one person or a small fixed group of people.
 
Xiaomin Chu said:
Want to learn QFT but often lose courage when seeing such a huge book(M. Srednicki). [...]
Here's a strategy which I know works (at least for Peskin \& Schroeder -- I don't know about Srednicki).

1) Google for, and download, any errata list(s) for the book.

2) Read through a chapter of the book, noting in pencil (in the margins) things you find unclear.

3) Read through the same chapter again, slower, this time reproducing all their calculations in detail.
(Often, these authors skip steps, so you need to work through them so you understand every step.)
Ask questions here on PF if there's still items you find unclear.

4) Do all the exercises at the end of the chapter. (IIRC, Prof Peskin posts handwritten sketches
of solutions on his website, so you can get a bit of help that way.)
Ask on PF (probably in the homework forums) if you get stuck on any of the exercises.Don't worry about the size of the book. Just maintain the discipline above, although it might
take long time. If you keep moving forward, you'll get there in the end.
 
strangerep said:
Here's a strategy which I know works (at least for Peskin \& Schroeder -- I don't know about Srednicki).

1) Google for, and download, any errata list(s) for the book.

2) Read through a chapter of the book, noting in pencil (in the margins) things you find unclear.

3) Read through the same chapter again, slower, this time reproducing all their calculations in detail.
(Often, these authors skip steps, so you need to work through them so you understand every step.)
Ask questions here on PF if there's still items you find unclear.

4) Do all the exercises at the end of the chapter. (IIRC, Prof Peskin posts handwritten sketches
of solutions on his website, so you can get a bit of help that way.)
Ask on PF (probably in the homework forums) if you get stuck on any of the exercises.Don't worry about the size of the book. Just maintain the discipline above, although it might
take long time. If you keep moving forward, you'll get there in the end.
Thanks a lot!
 
Yes, don't get demotivated. QFT is a difficult subject, and "one learns modesty in quantum field theory" (G. Scharf in his book "Finite Quantum Electrodynamics").
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top