Is there any possibility that the high voltages needed for lightning

  • Thread starter Thread starter arydberg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lightning
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origins of high voltages in lightning, questioning whether they could be generated by thunderclouds exhibiting characteristics similar to piezoelectric materials. It is established that the electric energy in thunderclouds is thermally driven, resulting from the movement and interaction of water vapor, while piezoelectricity arises from mechanical strain in solids. Participants express skepticism about the clarity of lightning's mechanisms, noting that while there are reasonable explanations, definitive proof remains elusive. The conversation also touches on the phenomenon of "bolts from the blue," challenging the idea that lightning is always associated with visible clouds. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the complexity and ongoing mystery surrounding the generation of lightning.
arydberg
Messages
244
Reaction score
31
Is there any possibility that the high voltages needed for lightning come from the thunderclouds assuming some characteristics of a crystal. In the same way a PZT is able to generate enough voltage for a spark.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


They are very different effects.

The electric energy in thundercouds is thermal in origin. The electric energy in the piezo effect is elastic (mechanical).

go well
 


Could you explain more. I know there are temperature differences in thunderstorms but how does this produce high voltage charges.
 


Thanks for the link. It is very complete but I intended this to be speculation perhaps for discussion. As an encyclopedia Wikipedia does not deal with speculation. Everything needs to be referenced.
 


Could you explain more.

OK.

Firstly lightning.

Have you ever seen lightning from a cloudless, blue sky?
Of course not. Lightning is associated with clouds. Heavy thick clouds.
Clouds are created by thermal evaporation of water from land and sea.
They are moved around in the atmosphere by thermally generated air currents.
As they move around they bump into each other and rub shoulders and whatnot.
This action (and maybe some of the other more esoteric ideas in Wikipedia too) cause electrons to be rubbed from one cloud mass and transferred to another so the whole cloud mass becomes charged. Eventually this charge is discharged by the flash and ground return stroke we see as lightning, although sometimes the flashes also pass between oppositely charged clouds, if they approach each other closely enough.

Note that electrons are transferred.

This is why I say the process is thermally driven.

Now for piezoelectricity.

This phenomenon occurs in neutral (non charged) solids. For certain solids if they are strained (distorted) the direction of the ionic bonds is changed slightly. This polarises the crystal as whole so that one end becomes positve and the other negative. The crystal remains neutral overall, however. The faster the straining the greater the voltage developed this way, which is why spark igniters incorporate a hammer mechanism.

There is an dual phenomenon known as electrostriction where the crystal changes shape in response to an applied voltage.

go well
 
Last edited:


arydberg said:
Thanks for the link. It is very complete but I intended this to be speculation perhaps for discussion. As an encyclopedia Wikipedia does not deal with speculation. Everything needs to be referenced.

What? Why would you want "speculation" instead of facts?
 


because no one really knows where lighting comes from. The voltages are too high for most or all explanations.
 


arydberg said:
because no one really knows where lighting comes from. The voltages are too high for most or all explanations.

What makes you think that?
 
  • #10


arydberg said:
because no one really knows where lighting comes from. The voltages are too high for most or all explanations.

While there might not be 100% conclusive proof of the mechanism for producing lightning, we definitely have reasonable explanations for it. Also, I don't believe ice crystals have a pizoelectric effect.
 
  • #11


Studiot said:
OK.

Firstly lightning.

Have you ever seen lightning from a cloudless, blue sky?
Of course not.
Yes, I have. OK, there were some small clouds way down at the horizon, probably 40 or so miles away. But where I was when the "bolt out of the blue" hit had no clouds anywhere near. Clouds did form about 20 minutes later.

Studiot said:
This action (and maybe some of the other more esoteric ideas in Wikipedia too) cause electrons to be rubbed from one cloud mass and transferred to another so the whole cloud mass becomes charged. Eventually this charge is discharged by the flash and ground return stroke we see as lightning, although sometimes the flashes also pass between oppositely charged clouds, if they approach each other closely enough.
To establish a charge, you have to make one area become more positive and another area become more negative. That would be a neat trick to just up and transfer the electrons from one cloud to another. Are you saying the clouds rub against each other? Clouds I have seen are fuzzy and don't really have a rubbing surface at all.

So how is it that the cloud has a charge relative to ground? Did it rub on the ground, too?
 
  • #12


arydberg said:
because no one really knows where lighting comes from. The voltages are too high for most or all explanations.

I have a pretty good idea where it comes from, and I haven't seen anyone explain this anywhere, yet.
 
  • #13


OK then. How is it formed.
 
  • #14


arydberg said:
OK then. How is it formed.

It's still theory. I have no way of testing it or investigating. At this point I'm not ready to spill it. I'm waiting to see if any academic based research figures it out. But I can say it is not a piezoelectric effect.
 
Back
Top