Is there any pressure inside the free falling fluid?

AI Thread Summary
In a scenario where a fluid is freely falling from a cylindrical vessel while being continuously filled from the top, the pressure sensor at the bottom will not read the hydrostatic pressure as it would under normal conditions. Instead, it may read zero pressure due to the fluid being in free fall, akin to a weightless state, as described by Einstein's equivalence principle. However, some discussions suggest that the sensor could register a pressure influenced by friction between the fluid and the vessel walls. Additionally, the pressure in the surrounding air and the continuity of pressure at the fluid-air interface are crucial considerations. Overall, the sensor's reading will be affected by both gravitational effects and external pressures, leading to a complex interaction.
sbu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Imagine a high cylindrical vessel (like a vertical pipe with bottom installed) of an OD = 10 inches and fluid inside that vessel (e.g. water). If we install pressure sensor on the wall of the vessel (inside the the vessel) near the bottom, it will read hydro-static pressure of the fluid column inside the vessel.

Now imagine that we will take the bottom of the vessel away, so that fluid will fall off freely, but we will keep filling the top of the vessel with fluid so that it will be constantly kept full, even though the fluid is just leaking out at the bottom. What will the pressure sensor read?

The versions that were brought up during discussion with my colleagues are:
- sensor will read zero pressure because the fluid is in free fall and hence it is a condition similar to the absence of gravity (so falling fluid will have no weight and hence no hydro-static pressure will be exerted on the sensor)
- sensor will read hydro-static pressure minus friction pressure loss between the fluid and the walls of a vessel

It will be interesting to hear your thoughts on this :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This seems interesting and I've been thinking of it for a while, but I think I have convinced myself, the fundamental principle of hydrostatics states that the change in pressure ΔP = pgΔh, for a free falling object (assuming negligeable tidal forces), the object is "weightless", it will seem at it is in outer space [this is Einstein's equivalence principle], so g = 0 and ΔP = 0, but there must be some constant pressure out there, it might due to friction, one thing for sure that the sensor will read a constant pressure that isn't issued from the fluid itself, but transmitted by the fluid [Pascal's theorem], if the sensor read only relative pressure, the result will be zero (+ some errors due the bumbing with air outside at it's pressure get's higher), I'd like to hear some thoughts too !,
 
There is a simple way of reasoning out the answer to this question. Here are two questions to stimulate your thinking:

1. What is the pressure in the air in the region immediately surrounding the fluid exiting from the bottom of the pipe?

2. Is pressure continuous at the interface between the fluid and the air?

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes Andy Resnick
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top