Is there anything known as a Heat conductor

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Young Learner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductor Heat
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of heat conductors, specifically whether there exists a material that can conduct heat along a fixed path without deviation, akin to how copper wires conduct electricity. Participants explore various methods of heat transfer, including the Peltier effect, and discuss the limitations and properties of different materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that all metals are generally good conductors of heat but question the existence of a conductor that directs heat without deviation.
  • Others argue that heat will always diffuse through materials, with the efficiency depending on insulation and the properties of the conductor.
  • Heat-pipes are mentioned as having good conduction properties with low losses, though they still experience some degree of heat loss.
  • One participant explains that heat transfer occurs through conduction, convection, or radiation, and emphasizes that no perfect conductor or insulator exists.
  • Silica aerogel is noted for its low thermal conductivity and unique properties, suggesting that its pore structure can influence heat conduction.
  • Several participants discuss the Peltier effect, highlighting challenges in separating heat and cold when the power supply is removed, with one noting that the temperatures will equalize without a constant voltage.
  • There is a suggestion that insulation could be used to prevent heat from flowing back in systems utilizing the Peltier effect.
  • One participant mentions that systems can be designed to move heat in one direction, such as in central heating systems, but emphasizes that energy expenditure is necessary for effective heat transfer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of heat conduction and the feasibility of achieving a perfect conductor. There is no consensus on the possibility of separating heat and cold in the context of the Peltier effect, with some asserting it cannot be done without a continuous power supply.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on insulation and the limitations of materials in achieving efficient heat transfer. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical and theoretical considerations regarding heat conduction and the Peltier effect.

Young Learner
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
All the metals are generally good conductors of heat.

But is there a conductor for heat which drives heat without deviating or diverging through a fixed path as copper wires conduct electricity.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I don't understand the question - if you put a heat source at one end of a copper wire eventually it will conduct and diffuse its way through the wire, if the wire is properly insulated to prevent too much loss.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Well insulated heat-pipes are the first thing that popped into my mind, as the conduction is very good and the loss is very low...depending on some factors. But as dipole said a simple insulated wire is also heat conductor, albeit perhaps not nearly as good. It will conduct much more slowly, but exactly how much heat "deviates" from the path will depend largely on the insulation. There will probably always be losses in the form of heat. Even an electric wire has losses in the form of heat.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Heat will move from a higher temperature to a lower temperature by conduction, convection, or radiation.
There is no such thing as a perfect conductor of heat nor a perfect insulator.
You also cannot store heat as the temperature of the body will eventually become the same as its surroundings.

One can transfer heat from one specific location to another specific location by several methods:
1. Transfer through a solid - heat will move from the higher temperature end to the lower temperature end, and as dipole mentioned, for efficiency the solid has to be insulated from the environment, although this may be fine for short distances. Conduction would be the prime mover of heat.
2. Enclose a fluid, gas or liquid, in a confined pipe, in which case, conduction and convection would be the means of heat transfer. Radiation may or may not be negligable.
3. Move a mass of heated fluid from one location to another by enclosure within in a pipe. Raise the temperature of the fluid at one end and by means of a prime mover such as a pump, and transfer the heated fluid to another location. The system can be even closed loop such as the cooling system in your car, or open loop such as the water heater in your house to supply hot water to your tap, through the copper pipe. For long distances this is more efficient than items 1 or 2.
4. Use directed radiation. Beam divergence may be a problem.

Depending upon the mathematical model and system, the conduction of heat can approach that of through an idealized 'conductor' to some extent, but will never be achieved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Silica aerogel has interesting thermal properties (but not quite the one you were asking about)...
http://energy.lbl.gov/ecs/aerogels/sa-thermal.html

Minimizing the Gaseous Component of Thermal Conductivity

A typical silica aerogel has a total thermal conductivity of ~0.017 W/mK (~R10/inch). A major portion of this energy transport results from the gases contained within the aerogel. This is the transport mode that is most easily controllable. As a consequence of their fine pore structure, the mean pore diameter of an aerogel is similar in magnitude to the mean free path of nitrogen (and oxygen) molecules at standard temperatures and pressures. If the mean free path of a particular gas were longer than the pore diameter of an aerogel, the gas molecules would collide more frequently with the pore walls than with each other. If this were the case, the thermal energy of the gas would be transferred to the solid portion of the aerogel (with its low intrinsic conductivity). Lengthening the mean free path relative to the mean pore diameter can be accomplished in three ways: by filling the aerogel with a gas with a lower molecular mass (and a longer mean free path) than air, by reducing the pore diameter of the aerogel, and by lowering the gas pressure within the aerogel.

I suppose if you could shape the pores you could make a material that conducts heat better in one plane than another?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
My main objective of the question was, when I have simultaneous heating and cooling on either junction a of a material as in Peltier effect, I need to extract the heat and cold temperatures separately for further use. The problem here is very quickly the hot and cold temperatures cancel out each other.
Is there anyway I can successfully transfer the heat?
 
Young Learner said:
My main objective of the question was, when I have simultaneous heating and cooling on either junction a of a material as in Peltier effect, I need to extract the heat and cold temperatures separately for further use. The problem here is very quickly the hot and cold temperatures cancel out each other.
Is there anyway I can successfully transfer the heat?

What do you mean they 'cancel out'? The peltier effect should remove heat from the cold side, and dissipate it on the hot side.
 
Yes, Peltier effect produces heats one side and cools other side.

But, when I remove the supply, The temperature from the hot side heats the cold side.

To explain it numerically, When I apply a voltage V to a Peltier module, heat is dissipated at one side and absorbed on the other. Let us say that the temperature at one side is 200 C and temperature at the other side is -200 C.

When I remove the supply, the temperature at both the sides become 0. I need to separate 200 C and -200 C for further use.
 
Young Learner said:
Yes, Peltier effect produces heats one side and cools other side.

But, when I remove the supply, The temperature from the hot side heats the cold side.

To explain it numerically, When I apply a voltage V to a Peltier module, heat is dissipated at one side and absorbed on the other. Let us say that the temperature at one side is 200 C and temperature at the other side is -200 C.

When I remove the supply, the temperature at both the sides become 0. I need to separate 200 C and -200 C for further use.

Can't be done. The two sides are touching. Without a constant voltage both sides will simply return to equilibrium. You have to use the temperature difference while the device is active. At best you could store the heat in another object that's attached to each side, but you're still limited by the amount of heat the device can pump per unit of time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
The only way to do it is to remove the Peltier effect device and replace with insulation.

There are systems that move heat only one way. For example a home central heating system will move heat from the boiler/furnace to the rads, which can be some distance away. Turn off the circulating pump and not much heat will flow back the other way. Lots of variations on this theme exist.

You cannot do it without expending energy. It can be tricky to get your head around but..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_demon
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K