Is There a Calculus Relationship Between These Kinematics Equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between kinematic equations, specifically how the velocity equation is derived from the position equation through calculus. It confirms that the velocity of an object is the time-derivative of its position function. Participants clarify that the final velocity is a variable dependent on time, not a constant. One user seeks to derive another kinematic equation from the existing ones but later decides to look for answers elsewhere. The conversation emphasizes the interconnectedness of these equations in kinematics.
tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1
{ y }_{ f }={ y }_{ i }+{ v }_{ yi }t+\frac { 1 }{ 2 } { a }_{ y }{ t }^{ 2 }\\ { v }_{ yf }={ v }_{ yi }+{ a }_{ y }t

It almost looks like the second equation is the derivative of the first equation with respect to time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Exactly. The velocity of an object is simply the time-derivative of its position function.
 


Pengwuino said:
Exactly. The velocity of an object is simply the time-derivative of its position function.

Maybe I'm incredibly rusty on my calculus, but isn't the time-derivative of the first equation the following?

0={ v }_{ yi }+{ a }_{ y }t
 


##v_{yf}## isn't a constant, it's a variable, more specifically the dependent variable, a function of t. Written as functions, your two equations are

$$y(t) = y_i + v_{yi} t + \frac{1}{2}a_y t^2 \\ v_y(t) = v_{yi} + a_y t$$
 


jtbell said:
##v_{yf}## isn't a constant, it's a variable, more specifically the dependent variable, a function of t. Written as functions, your two equations are

$$y(t) = y_i + v_{yi} t + \frac{1}{2}a_y t^2$$

$$v_y(t) = v_{yi} + a_y t$$

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top