I Is this a compound angle? What's the geometric meaning?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter xXNightEagleXx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Geometric
xXNightEagleXx
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
?temp_hash=e0c002ddf2ed5251e477e5a6190da5df.jpg


β is vehicle sideslip (angle between velocity and vehicle forward vector) ψ the angle between the trajectory tangent and vehicle forward vector. I have this equation that says

Vx * k * (cos ψ - tan β * sin ψ)

where k is trajectory curvature (1 / r) at point p.

Now i must say that I'm not proficient with compound angles at all, so I'm struggling to understand if everything inside the parenthesis is basically a compound angle. Moreover I'm struggling to visualize its geometric meaning.

Can anyone try to help me out with this one?

(I believe that k just acts as a multiplier according to the curvature so it's not the problem itself)

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • ?temp_hash=e0c002ddf2ed5251e477e5a6190da5df.jpg
    ?temp_hash=e0c002ddf2ed5251e477e5a6190da5df.jpg
    15 KB · Views: 961
Mathematics news on Phys.org
xXNightEagleXx said:
I have this equation that says
Vx * k * (cos ψ - tan β * sin ψ)
That's not an equation that says anything because there are no two sides with an "equals" sign between them. Setting that aside, you can rewrite the expression as
$$V_xk\frac{\cos (\psi+\beta)}{\cos \beta}$$
Does this answer your question?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top