Is this a correct proof of a function's continuity?

[0x95]

Hello,
1. Homework Statement
1) Let f(x) continuous for all x and (f(x)²)=1 for all x. Prove that f(x)=1 for all x or f(x)=-1 for all x.
2) Give an example of a function f(x) s.t. (f(x)²)=1 for all x and it has both positive and negative values. Does it contradict (1) ?

2. The attempt at a solution
1) f(x)² = 1 → f(x)=±1 → f(x) = 1 ∨ f(x) = -1 (since f(x) can't be both)
2) There's no such function.
A step function s.t.

I consider incorrect since in this case f(x) =1 or f(x)=-1 not for all x but f(x)=1 for some domain and f(x)=-1 for another domain.

Is this a correct solution ?

Thank you

 

[geoffrey159]

No, you have to show that $f$ is always equal to 1, or always equal to -1.

 

[0x95]

That's what I've shown in (1), that f(x)=1 for all x or f(x)=-1 for all x

 

[geoffrey159]

No, you only show that for any $x$, $f(x) \in \{-1,1\}$, which is not the same thingEDIT: Why is it impossible to have $x_a,x_b\in\mathbb{R}$ such that $f(x_a) = 1$ and $f(x_b) = -1$ ?

 

[0x95]

ok, I see. a function can be a two-point function.
and for (1) would it be correct to say that:
lim f(g(x))=f(lim g(x) ):
lim (g(x)) ^ 2 = (lim g(x) ) ^ 2 = 1 -> lim g(x) = 1 or lim g(x) = -1

 

[geoffrey159]

Why do you talk about limits? You are not looking for a local property, but a global one, aren't you ?

EDIT: Following the hint given in post #4, what kind of set would be $f([x_a,x_b])$ and why would it be absurd given that $1,-1 \in f([x_a,x_b])$ ?

 

[0x95]

Would you elaborate more on your last post, I didn't quite get you.
Thanks

 

[geoffrey159]

The nature of $f([x_a,x_b])$ is given by the intermediate value theorem.

 

[pasmith]

Hello,
1. Homework Statement
1) Let f(x) continuous for all x and (f(x)²)=1 for all x. Prove that f(x)=1 for all x or f(x)=-1 for all x.
2) Give an example of a function f(x) s.t. (f(x)²)=1 for all x and it has both positive and negative values. Does it contradict (1) ?

2. The attempt at a solution
1) f(x)² = 1 → f(x)=±1 → f(x) = 1 ∨ f(x) = -1 (since f(x) can't be both)
2) There's no such function.

You contradict yourself:

A step function s.t.

This is a function such that f(x)^2 = 1 for all x and takes both positive and negative values. Another example is <br /> f(x) = \begin{cases} 1 &amp; x \in \mathbb{Q}, \\<br /> -1 &amp; x \notin \mathbb{Q}.\end{cases} Indeed the number of such functions is equal to twice the number of ways of partitioning the reals into two disjoint non-empty subsets.

But do any of these functions contradict the assertion that a continuous function f satisfying f(x)^2 = 1 for all x must be constant?