Quantum Is this a good book to learn quantum physics?

AI Thread Summary
Arthur March's "Quantum Mechanics of Particles and Waves," published in 1951 and reprinted by Dover, offers a solid foundation in quantum mechanics (QM), but lacks coverage of more recent developments and topics such as angular momentum, which are typically included in modern graduate curricula. While the text provides valuable insights, particularly in nuclear physics and field theory, it may not align with current graduate studies focused on recent applications. Readers may find March's writing style terse compared to contemporary textbooks like Shankar or Sakurai, which are generally considered more accessible. Ultimately, the suitability of March's book depends on individual learning goals; it is beneficial for foundational knowledge but may fall short for those seeking to understand the latest advancements in quantum mechanics.
Vectronix
Messages
64
Reaction score
2
Quantum Mechanics of Particles and Wave Fields by Arthur March... Does anyone know of the author? I think I found an error in this book. :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have a copy of March, Quantum Mechanics of Particle and Waves, Dover Ed. I must have been impressed by the topics it or I would not have bought it. First off, I notice that the Dover reprint was of a book that was written in 1951. This is not necessarily bad. If you complete the text you will know QM, but you will not cover any topics in QM that came up during the last 60 years. Nevertheless, the old masters, really new their QM.

It looks like the addition of angular momentum (e.g Clebsch Gordon Coefficients) is not addressed. This is usually in the curriculum for first year physics grad students.

On the other hand, later section in March addressing nuclear physics and field theory are more than what first year physics grads generally take.

Summary, whether March is good depends on your goals. You can certainly learn QM from March, and if you go through it, you may learn a lot that is not covered in physics graduate school programs these days. This may be worth pursuing. If your goal is to what the grad students cover these days and prepare you for recent applications, this is not your book.

March is certainly terse, and I think most common first year textbooks like Shankar, or Sakurai, are an easier read.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
This is part 2 of my thread Collection of Free Online Math Books and Lecture Notes Here, we will consider physics and mathematical methods for physics resources. Now, this is a work in progress. Please feel free comment regarding items you want to be included, or if a link is broken etc. Note: I will not post links to other collections, each link will point you to a single item. :book:📚📒 [FONT=trebuchet ms]Introductory college/university physics College Physics, Openstax...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
624
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Back
Top