Is This Baby Mammoth the Best Preserved Specimen Yet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A recently discovered baby mammoth in north-west Siberia, believed to be around 10,000 years old, is being hailed as one of the best-preserved specimens of its kind. The six-month-old female calf, found on the Yamal peninsula, has intact features such as its trunk and eyes, along with some remaining fur. Scientists plan to send the carcass to Japan for further analysis, which may provide valuable DNA samples. There is a discussion about the feasibility of extracting DNA from the frozen remains, clarifying that DNA can still be retrieved even if the cells are no longer alive, as long as the DNA is well-preserved. The discovery is not only significant for its biological implications but also offers insights into the climate of the era in which the mammoth lived.
Evo
Staff Emeritus
Messages
24,029
Reaction score
3,323
Since previous articles on Mammoths were posted here due to the DNA/cloning issue I thought I'd put it here (see even mentors aren't always sure where to put things).

I thought this was very cool. This might give us a good DNA sample.

Baby mammoth discovery unveiled

A baby mammoth unearthed in the permafrost of north-west Siberia could be the best preserved specimen of its type, scientists have said.

The frozen carcass is to be sent to Japan for detailed study.

The six-month-old female calf was discovered on the Yamal peninsula of Russia and is thought to have died 10,000 years ago.

The animal's trunk and eyes are still intact and some of its fur remains on the body.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6284214.stm
 
Biology news on Phys.org
if someone can answer this please do,
How on Earth do scientists get DNA from the frozen carcass, wouldn't all the cells in the body have died by now?
 
tommy-gunn said:
if someone can answer this please do,
How on Earth do scientists get DNA from the frozen carcass, wouldn't all the cells in the body have died by now?

A cell doesn't need to be alive to extract DNA. The DNA just needs to be intact and decently preserved. Even if it was partially degraded, I would assume you could still do a shotgun assembly to rebuild and retrieve the original sequence.
 
Evo said:
Since previous articles on Mammoths were posted here due to the DNA/cloning issue I thought I'd put it here (see even mentors aren't always sure where to put things).

I thought this was very cool. This might give us a good DNA sample.

Baby mammoth discovery unveiled



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6284214.stm

This was quite the discovery!

It fits with the Biology forum but it will also have implications (according to the article) to do with the climate of that period. Really quite the "perfect specimen". Poor little mammoth. Don't they need a consent form signed by the baby or the mother to collect DNA? This may infer the wrath of the Ghost Mammoths. They never forget.:eek:
 
Thats is really something special. Even at 100,000 yrs old, its still cute too!
 
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom

Similar threads

Back
Top