Is this function realizable for every yes/no why should be provided?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arslan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the realizability of a given transfer function, specifically (s^2+1)/(s+1), in relation to physical systems. It emphasizes that for a system to be realizable, the highest power of s in the denominator must be greater than or equal to that in the numerator, which is not the case here, indicating it is not realizable. The conversation also highlights the importance of damping factors in real systems, which prevent responses from tending towards infinity. Additionally, there is a debate regarding the modeling of an inverted pendulum system, where some participants argue it is realizable despite conflicting opinions. Ultimately, the need for damping and the mathematical conditions for realizability are key points in the discussion.
Arslan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Is this function realizable for every yes/no "why" should be provided?

(s^2+1)/(s+1)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


its the laplace transform , give me intution based answer
 


I thought about this for a bit while sitting in Sensors & Controls class, using a ton of Laplace transforms. I think this is right, but here goes:

The determining factor concerns the highest power of s in both the numerator and denominator, so let's call them m and n, respectively. Mathematically, real systems correspond to transforms where n >= m, so the highest power in the denominator has to be greater than the highest power in the numerator. As you can see in your example, the numerator power is higher, so this is not a realizable system. Also, try doing an inverse laplace transform on it.

Intuitively, though, the frequency response of such systems tend towards infinity, with nothing damping it. This never happens in reality because no quantity ever "reaches" infinity -- there's always something damping it. Things like air resistance, friction, heat transfer, and viscocity all stop systems from racing off towards infinity; even subatomic particles are (ostensibly) limited by the speed of light. Any physically relizable system needs to have damping factors like these included in the system's model.

Plot this system in MATLAB to see the frequency response:
bode(tf([1 0 1], [1 1])).

Anyways, that's my interpretation... can anyone confirm this?
 


i was doing the modeling of inverted pendulum attached to cart and pulley and also a servo motor attached with it.I divided transfer function in 3 parts i.e
1.Voltage and angular frequency of pulley
2.angular frequency of pulley and force on cart
3.Force on cart and angle of pendulum

. and there i get a transfer function between force applied on cart and angular frequency as
Jw'=(F-Bw)*r

F(s)/w(s)=(J/r)s+B

and it is a realizable and practicle system.
But theries are saying it is not realizable?
 

Attachments

  • invped.jpg
    invped.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 429


and also its simulink results are showing an impulse as output to step response.
And it is intuitively correct that the applied torque will only apply force on cart in form of pulse. i.e body can experience constant force if it is accelerating. if it is moving with contant velcity applied force will be zero.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top