Is this microscope good for looking at cells and other small things?

  • Thread starter Thread starter labprofess
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microscope
AI Thread Summary
The microscope in question offers a maximum magnification of 2500x and includes a 3MP camera, making it suitable for observing human and plant cells, as well as other small specimens. While the specifications are impressive, concerns were raised about the mechanical stability of the microscope, which could affect high-magnification imaging due to potential vibrations and backlash in the z-stage. The standard quality of the objectives is uncertain, although replacements are available at low cost. Additionally, the lack of phase contrast or darkfield capabilities limits its effectiveness for unstained specimens. Overall, it is considered a good choice for stained samples but may not perform well with untreated materials.
labprofess
Hi all

So I am planning to save up for this microscope because I am trying to 'upgrade' from my microscope whos max magnification is 1000x (keep in mind Its not clear at max the highest it would be a good image at is 500x)
http://www.amscope.com/40x-2500x-le...d-microscope-w-3d-stage-1-3mp-usb-camera.html

This is exactly a microscope I am searching for, correct magnification and camera but anyone ever used this? Is it a good microscope? And how is it at the max magnification?

(Not sure if important but mostly going to look at cells (human cells and plant cells) and other small things (sperm,etc.)

Thanks!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I never used this microscope but I just looked at the list of specs and I am impressed. The x2500 magnification is quite impressive and with half price discount, I would say this is a very successful choice. For your planned use, this will be an excellent choice. Good luck and let me know how it goes once you use it.
 
They also sell a 3MP camera. I would highly suggest getting the upgraded camera.

BoB
 
SciencewithDrJ said:
I never used this microscope but I just looked at the list of specs and I am impressed. The x2500 magnification is quite impressive and with half price discount, I would say this is a very successful choice. For your planned use, this will be an excellent choice. Good luck and let me know how it goes once you use it.

will do
 
labprofess said:
Hi all

So I am planning to save up for this microscope because I am trying to 'upgrade' from my microscope whos max magnification is 1000x (keep in mind Its not clear at max the highest it would be a good image at is 500x)
http://www.amscope.com/40x-2500x-le...d-microscope-w-3d-stage-1-3mp-usb-camera.html

This is exactly a microscope I am searching for, correct magnification and camera but anyone ever used this? Is it a good microscope? And how is it at the max magnification?

(Not sure if important but mostly going to look at cells (human cells and plant cells) and other small things (sperm,etc.)

Thanks!

I like that it has a substage condenser, with the ability to align and focus the condenser lens, and I like the use of LED illumination. However, I suspect the microscope and stage itself aren't sufficiently mechanically stiff- vibrations will severely impact your ability to perform high-magnification imaging. Also, the z-stage will possibly have a lot of backlash, making fine focusing a headache.

The objectives all seem very 'standard', it's unclear what their quality is. The good news is that you can get replacements that will work better for very little money on ebay.
 
Looks like this is a very reasonably priced microscope, however I would expect it to only be very useful for looking at stained section, or things already colored like blood smears on slides.

It does not have (as far as I can tell) any phase contrast of darkfield capabilities. It would therefore not be too useful for looking at unstained material, many aspects of which are revealed through phase contrast or darkfield illumination. This rules out looking at things like pondwater without some kind of treatment.

I am not sure how well these higher magnification lenses would work with using oil immersion lenses, which they don't appear to be. They may just produce kinda blurry images.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
15K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top