Is this parameterization correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrassy
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 5K views
andrassy
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I have to parameterize the elliptic paraboloid z = 16 - x^2 - y^2 from z = 12 to z = 16. Is the correct parameterization just X(s,t) = (s*cos(t), s*sin(t), 16 - s^2 - t^2) where s ranges from 0 to 2 and t ranges from 0 to 2pi?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think so, since [tex]16-(s \cos t)^2 - (s \sin t)^2 \neq 16 - s^2 - t^2[/tex].

Since you already have z=f(x,y), you can just let x,y be your parametric variables s,t.
 
Defennder's suggestion is the simplest.

If you really are determined to use polar coordinates (which is what you appear to be doing), then x= s cos t, y= s sin t and then

z= 16- x2- y2= what?
 
I had thought about doing it that way as well with (s, t, 16 - s^2 - t^2), but I don't know what s and t range from then. Is it just from 0 to 2 for both?

whoops also, before I meant to make my parameterization (s cost, s sint, 16 - s^2). Would this be right doing it that way? Because 16 - (s cost)^2 - (s sint)^2 = 16 - s^2(cos^2 + sin^2) = 16 - s^2. Then the s would range from 0 to 2. Is this right?
 
Last edited:
You said "z = 12 to z = 16" which would project to the xy-plane as the circle from r= 0 to r= 2. Yes, taking x= s cos(t), y= s sin(t), z= 16- s2, essentially polar coordinates, s ranges from 0 to 2 and t from 0 to [itex]2\pi[/itex].