Is This Sequence a Cauchy Sequence?

jaqueh
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose the sequence (Sn) is defined as:
|Sn+1-Sn|<2-n
show that this is a cauchy sequence

Homework Equations


hint: prove the polygon identity such that
d(Sn,Sm)≤d(Sn,Sn+1)+d(Sn+1,Sn+2)...+d(Sm-1,Sm)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have defined Sm and Sn and created the inequality that:
d(Sn,Sm)=|2-n-2-m|>||Sn+1-Sn|-|Sm+1-Sm||
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the hint, you'd get |Sn-Sm|<|Sn-Sn+1|+...+|Sm-1-Sm|<2-n+...+2-m
Is there any type of cauchy sequence (perhaps of partial sums) that would fit the latter half?
 
ok I think I get what I can do now with the polygon ineq. except I thought that it would only be less than 2-n+...+2m-1also I don't know if I need to prove the polygon identity or not. if I did how would I go about it? would I use a fact of geometric series?
 
Proving the "polygon" identity comes as a direct result of the definition of a metric, and the triangle inequality. A simple proof by induction would suffice.
While it is true you could remove the factor of 2-m from the inequality, you can add it on and still have the inequality hold true (plus it's better looking notation wise).
We know Ʃ2-n is a geometric series, and thus converges. Convergent sequences of partial sums (partial sums of a geometric series) are cauchy sequences. So Ʃ2-k from 1 to n minus Ʃ2-k from 1 to m would be less than ε
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top