Is This the Correct Approach to Derive Wien's Displacement Law?

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



I have ##E(w)=w^3(e^{\beta\bar{h}w}-1)^{-1}##,

where ##\beta=K_{B}T##, ##K_{B}## boltzman constant

Homework Equations



Need to solve ##\frac{dE(w)}{dw}=0##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
##k=\beta\bar{h}##:

##\frac{dE(w)}{dw}=3w^2(e^{kw}-1)^{-1}+w^3(e^{kw}-1)^{-2}ke^{kw}(-1)##
##=\frac{3w^{2}(e^{kw}-1)-kw^3e^{kw}}{(e^{kw}-1)^2}##

##\implies w^2(e^{kw}(3-kw)-3)=0##

##w\neq 0 \implies e^{kw}(3-kw)-3=0##

Is this right so far? I don't know how I'd solve this now...?

Many thanks .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
Is this right so far? I don't know how I'd solve this now...?
That's correct, but there is no analytical solution to that equation. You have to use a graphical or numerical approach to find the value of ω.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top