Is This the Correct Method for Finding dy/dx of y = ln(sin^{-1}(x))?

  • Thread starter Thread starter monet A
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the derivative dy/dx for the function y = ln(sin^{-1}(x)). The method used involves implicit differentiation and checks out with ordinary differentiation, confirming its validity. The participant expresses uncertainty about transferring y during differentiation, questioning if they were differentiating the same equation. Others reassure that the approach is correct and suggest that applying the chain rule could also be a valid method. Overall, the participant feels more confident in their differentiation skills but remains cautious about potential mistakes.
monet A
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
To find dy/dx for

y = ln(sin^{-1}(x))

I did this:

<br /> y = ln(sin^{-1}(x)) <br />

so

<br /> e^y = (sin^{-1}(x)) <br />

and

<br /> e^y \frac {dy}{dx} = \frac {1} {\sqrt{1-x^2}} <br />

then

<br /> \frac {dy}{dx} = \frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2} * e^y} <br />

<br /> = \frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2} * e^{ln(sin^{-1}(x))}} <br />

<br /> = \frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2} * (sin^{-1}(x))}} <br />

I think that its all valid implicit differentiation but I m not 100% confident about it, please help.

:frown:
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It looks fine to me, and the result checks out with ordinary differentiation. Which part were you uncertain about ?
 
You could have just as easily applied the chain rule but that seems to be fine :smile:
 
hypermorphism said:
It looks fine to me, and the result checks out with ordinary differentiation. Which part were you uncertain about ?

Just the validity of transferring y to differentiate both sides, I wasn't sure that I was differentiating the same equation, probably over thinking it.

Thanks heaps though because I think I am starting to become more capable with it but I don't want to be overconfident in mistakes.

:cool:
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top