Is This the Next Big Breakthrough in AI?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bassplayer142
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ai
AI Thread Summary
Honda's recent demonstration of mind-reading robotic technology has sparked significant excitement and skepticism in the media and among the public. While some view this advancement as a step towards the singularity, others question its implications and the media's focus, particularly when compared to other news stories like Michael Vick's job. The discussion highlights a broader concern about societal priorities, with some participants expressing frustration over the lack of attention given to groundbreaking scientific developments like cold fusion. There is also a debate about the practicality of mind-controlled technology, with references to existing neural sensors used in video games. Overall, while the innovation is seen as noteworthy, there are doubts about its true capabilities and the current state of artificial intelligence research.
bassplayer142
Messages
431
Reaction score
0
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090402/sc_nm/us_science_robots

This sounds exciting!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't believe this has happened already. Could the press be exaggerating? Is the singularity finally near?

It's all over the news now. National Geographic, BBC News...
 
This is crazy. First cold fusion and now this in one week, I can't handle it.On a side note, Yahoo's main news story is about M. Vick getting a job and not this! I can't believe how dumb and pathetic our society is becoming.

humanino said:

Who cares about mind controlled robots? You can already control video games with neural sensors.
 
Topher925 said:
On a side note, Yahoo's main news story is about M. Vick getting a job and not this! I can't believe how dumb and pathetic our society is becoming.

That's an issue with the rotating report process. I don't know how often it updates, but it's automated. It just reads off a list of top stories.
 
Topher925 said:
This is crazy. First cold fusion and now this in one week, I can't handle it.


On a side note, Yahoo's main news story is about M. Vick getting a job and not this! I can't believe how dumb and pathetic our society is becoming.



Who cares about mind controlled robots? You can already control video games with neural sensors.

Cold Fusion?
 
Topher925 said:
You can already control video games with neural sensors.

We can? :confused:

I liked processing thoughts more than the capability of developing thoughts.
 
If it were true, they would have badly chosen the date. You are fools.
 
First off haha for the fact that before i checked my yahoo email i saw the vicks story! Secondly what about cold fusion??
 
  • #10
Heres a much better written article than the yahoo one.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=robots-adam-and-eve-ai

We can?

Uhhh..yeah. The things don't work all that well but they work. Welcome to 2009 my friend.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826100006&Tpk=Neural Impluse Actuator

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/ocz_may_bring_its_neural_controller_consoles


Secondly what about cold fusion??

Are you kidding? Your on a physics forum and you didn't know about this?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510589,00.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
eventually when we get so advanced scientists will get so bored they'll have to re-invent things regardless of how ridiculous and impractical it is.

Like square wheels!
 
  • #12
Cyrus said:
Cold Fusion?
There's been a little bit in the news:

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-03/acs-fr031709.php
'Cold fusion' rebirth? New evidence for existence of controversial energy source

SALT LAKE CITY, March 23, 2009 — Researchers are reporting compelling new scientific evidence for the existence of low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR), the process once called "cold fusion" that may promise a new source of energy. One group of scientists, for instance, describes what it terms the first clear visual evidence that LENR devices can produce neutrons, subatomic particles that scientists view as tell-tale signs that nuclear reactions are occurring.
 
  • #14
rootX said:
cool! and it only costs 154 $ :biggrin:

It's down to 109.99. and you get a 20$ mail in rebate, making it only 89.99. Not too shabby
 
  • #15
OAQfirst said:
I can't believe this has happened already.

A moderate improvement in task automation? Happens all the time. This isn't nearly as impressive as it sounds. It's closer to a manufacturing robot in terms of features with a few nifty differences than it is to a super robot scientist.
 
  • #16
bassplayer142 said:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090402/sc_nm/us_science_robots

This sounds exciting!

Don't let the title fool you. The AI cannot actually think, and there's no reason to think that they ever will at the rate current research is going.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
68
Views
17K
Back
Top