Is this too Obvious? (additive inverse)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of the additive inverse in complex numbers, specifically verifying that for every complex number z, there exists a unique number w such that z + w = 0. The user expresses skepticism about the necessity of proving this, as it seems obvious and has always been taken for granted. A suggestion is made to express w in a clearer form, emphasizing its components as real numbers. The conversation touches on visualizing the additive inverse as the opposite vector in the Argand diagram, although this perspective is deemed irrelevant to the proof itself. Overall, the verification process is acknowledged as straightforward but somewhat unnecessary.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



In my new Linear Algebra book, it is discussing the basic properties of complex numbers

It says that "you should verify, using the familiar properties of Real numbers, that addition and multiplication on C satisfy the following properties..."

...
...
...
additive inverse: for every z\epsilonC, there exists a unique number w\epsilonC such that z+w=0

I have never been asked to show this before and have always just taken it as a given.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can assume real numbers have additive inverses. Write z=a+bi and say what w must is.
 
Right. So let z = (a + bi) then w = -(a + bi)

That just seems silly to me. Did I really verify anything?

Anyway, thanks! :smile:
 
Saladsamurai said:
Right. So let z = (a + bi) then w = -(a + bi)

That just seems silly to me. Did I really verify anything?

Anyway, thanks! :smile:

It's bit better to write that as w=(-a)+(-b)i rather than -(a+bi). That way you've shown w is a real number plus a real number times i. I'll certainly admit it's not a difficult proof.
 
I like to think of the additive inverse of a complex number visually. If a complex number is represented as a vector on the Argand diagram, then its additive inverse is the "opposite" of that vector.
 
Yes, but that is irrelevant to this particular problem.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top