? is to QM as Jackson is to electrodynamics.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around building a minilibrary of classic physics texts, focusing on key subjects like quantum mechanics (QM), statistical physics, and solid state physics. For QM, recommendations include "Quantum Mechanics" by Galindo & Pascual and J.J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics," with Schwinger's course also noted as a valuable resource. In statistical physics, W. Greiner's "Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics" is suggested for learning, while Landau & Lifschitz's volumes and K. Huang's book are recommended for more advanced study. For solid state physics, Kittel's introductory book is highlighted as a suitable textbook, with Mermin also recognized as a standard reference. The conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting texts that balance foundational knowledge with advanced concepts across these disciplines.
inha
Messages
576
Reaction score
1
I've been planning to get myself a minilibrary consisting of the classic books in various subjects. So far I've decided to get Goldstein for classical mechanics and Jackson for electrodynamics.

On the top of those I think I should have books of "similiar status" for QM, statistical physics and solid state physics. Any suggestions?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes,Galindo & Pascual [1].2 volumes.I think Springer editted one edition,back in '90.

The best there is.You could switch to J.J.Sakurai[2],if u don't like functional analysis...:wink:

Springer also published J.Schwinger's [3] course.It is rather good.

As for statistical phsysics,well,for learning/as a textbook (meaning a lot of examples & calculations),i'd say the book on thermo & stat in the Greiner[4] series.For more advanced look,either the 2 volumes in the Landau & Lifschitz [5,6]collection,or K.Huang [7].

For nonequilibrium SM,i'd say R.Balescu's [8]1975 book is good...

Zapper or someone else may give insights into solid state pysics.Kittel's [9]introductory book could be used as a textbook...


Daniel.
-----------------------------------------------------------
[1]Galindo & Pascual,"Quantum Mechanics",Springer Verlag,1990.
[2] J.J.Sakurai,"Modern Quantum Mechanics",Addison-Wesley,2-nd ed.,1993.
[3]J.Schwinger,"Quantum Mechanics",Springer Verlag,2001.
[4]W.Greiner,"Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics",any edition of the 2 published.
[5]L.D.Landau,E.M.Lifschitz,"Statistical Physics",Part I,vol.5 of their course.
[6]L.D.Landau,E.M.Lifschitz,"Statistical Physics",Part II,vol.9 of their course.
[7]K.Haung,"Statistical Mechanics",2-nd ed.,Wiley,1987.
[8]R.Balescu,"Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics",Wiley,1975.
[9]Ch.Kittel,"Introduction to solid state physics" (any edition,preferably the latest).
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Thanks for the suggestions. I'll browse through those for a bit to see which I like better.
 
Mermin is the standard for Solid State
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
243
Views
56K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Back
Top