Is Virtual Wave-Particle Duality a Misconception in Quantum Mechanics?

brianhurren
Messages
71
Reaction score
2
If there is such a thing as a virtual particle, is there also such a thing as a virtual wave? what would that actually mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More knowledgeable people than me would say 2 things:
*Wave-particle duality is a leftover from the early days of Quantum Mechanics. This concept is obsolete today.
* Virtual particles are internal lines of Feynman diagrams (which are pictorial representations of possible interaction scenarios in QFT and handy calculational tools in perturbation theory).
 
  • Like
Likes e.bar.goum
dextercioby said:
More knowledgeable people than me would say 2 things:
*Wave-particle duality is a leftover from the early days of Quantum Mechanics. This concept is obsolete today.
* Virtual particles are internal lines of Feynman diagrams (which are pictorial representations of possible interaction scenarios in QFT and handy calculational tools in perturbation theory).
So let me get this straight. particle wave duality is a left over from early qf because the physisist then were stuck in a paradime over particles and waves, as a result of observing material particles and mechanical waves in real world Newtonian physics. so in conclusion. a Tron ( say an electron.) sometimes be haves like a particle and sometimes like a wave. infact a Tron is neither (it is actually beyond our experience at our scale of existence where most things observed with the naked eye obey Newton.). there for waves are not the only thing that can create an interference pattern. The particle-wave nature of Trons is just one of the qualities that they have along with a raft of other quantum values like spin and charge ect.
 
brianhurren said:
So let me get this straight. particle wave duality is a left over from early qf

Its left over from ideas that were about prior to Dirac publishing his transformation theory in December 1926:
http://www.lajpe.org/may08/09_Carlos_Madrid.pdf

Specifically it was part of the 1924 thesis of De-Broglie that led to Schroedinger's equation and wave mechanics. But there was this thing called matrix mechanics that didn't have it and it was just as successful. Dirac showed they were two aspects of a more general theory based on observables and a quantum state with the wave-particle idea nowhere in sight.

That theory is basically what goes under the name of QM today. There is no wave-particle duality - simply this thing called a quantum state.

Why it still hangs around is because of the semi historical approach most texts take.

brianhurren said:
there for waves are not the only thing that can create an interference pattern.

The correct analysis of the double slit experiment has nothing to do with waves:
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1024152/files/0703126.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
342
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Back
Top