Is the Sign of the Wronskian Arbitrary in Differential Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sign Wronskian
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Wronskian's sign in determining fundamental solutions to differential equations. A student confirmed two functions were solutions and calculated a nonzero Wronskian, but received points deducted due to a sign discrepancy. It was noted that the sign of the Wronskian is indeed dependent on the order of the functions used. The grader likely compared the student's result to a solution sheet without considering the arbitrary nature of the sign. Ultimately, the student decided not to contest the grading decision, acknowledging the confusion around the Wronskian's order.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41
On my DE test, I was asked to determine if two solutions to a DE are fundamental solutions.

So I confirmed they were both solutions, and took the Wronskian, which was nonzero.

I got points marked off, and he put a minus sign in front of my wronskian result.

Isn't the sign of the Wronskian determined by what function I call y1 and what function I call y2 and is thus completely arbitrary?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes the sign on the Wronskian is determined by the ordering that you assign to the functions. It's a weak excuse, but the grader was probably just comparing your answer with their solution sheet and saw the sign difference and didn't think about why they were different.
 
Well, I looked at the test and on the paper the functions were called y1 and y2 already, and in my work I did write W[y1,y2] = my wronskian.

So I guess I can understand. I don't think I'll argue this one. I noticed that the wronskian order is arbitrary early off and have just been taking the easier derivative first.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top