Is (x + a + b)^7 - x^7 - a^7 - b^7 Divisible by x^2 + (a + b)x + ab?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hyperreality
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Hyperreality
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
My maths teacher says this problem is not as impossible as it seems, but I just can't solve it.

Show that (x + a + b)^7 - x^7 - a^7 - b^7 is divisble by
x^2 + (a + b)x +ab.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looking for the easy way out huh ?
You can always solve the entire excercise...

Live long and prosper.
 
Show that (x + a + b)^7 - x^7 - a^7 - b^7 is divisble by x^2 + (a + b)x +ab.

Hint:
Notice that (x+a) and (x+b) are the 2 factors of x^2 + (a + b)x +ab.
So it is equivalent to show that (x + a + b)^7 - x^7 - a^7 - b^7 is divisible by both (x+a) and (x+b).

Let f(x) = (x + a + b)^7 - x^7 - a^7 - b^7
...
...
...
...


Can you continue from here?

Hope this help. :smile:
 
just write everything out
eg. (x+a)^2=x^2+2xa+a^2

maybe rewrite some terms then and you will see that it is divisible by x^2 + (a + b)x +ab
 
KL has the easy way!

Writing it out however... *shudder* I wouldn't wish writing out a trinomial to the 7th power to anyone!

Hurkyl
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top