Is (x-h)^4(y-k)=Some Constant Also an Equation of a Rectangular Hyperbola?

gliteringstar
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
the general equation for rectangular hyperbola with vertical and horizontal asymptotes is given as :

(x-h)(y-k)= some constant

Is the following also an equation of rectangular hyperbola

(x-h)^4(y-k)=some constant ?

I am trying to find the shape of this curve,is it similar to that of rectangular hyperbola?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
...to be more precise...

the cartesian equation of rectangular hyperbola in question is given by:

xy=a^2

If we have it as (x-h)^4(y-k)=a^2,will the shape of graph of this rectangular hyperbola change?...the centre is different of course...it has shifted to (h,k) with the two parts of the graph lying in the newly formed first and third quadrant...

someone please reply!
 
With the fourth power, it will NOT be a hyperbola at all- though it may look somewhat like one. A "hyperbola", is defined as being one of the "conic sections" and so its equation must be second degree, not fifth degree as you give.
 
thank you :)

But how do we find the graph of such a function?and if not the graph,can we get some idea about point of intersection of graph of this function with any of the axes?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top