Is y(x,t) a Solution to the Wave Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Furbishkov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
Furbishkov
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is the function
y(x,t) = Ae(−β2x2−2βxt−t2) + Be(−x2+2αxt−α2t2)
a solution to the wave equation
2y / ∂t2 = v2 (∂2y / ∂x2)

Homework Equations



2y / ∂t2 = v2 (∂2y / ∂x2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have found the solution through finding the partial derivatives (∂2y / ∂t2 and ∂2y / ∂x2) of the function. I got that it is a solution if α=-1 and β=1. However, this was a very long winded process of taking derivatives and am wondering if there is another way to solve it. I notice now that if I put α=-1 and β=1 into the original equation, y(x,t) = Ae(−β2x2−2βxt−t2) + Be(−x2+2αxt−α2t2) , then the exponents are the same. Am I suppose to notice this right away instead of taking the derivatives? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Furbishkov said:

Homework Statement


Is the function
y(x,t) = Ae(−β2x2−2βxt−t2) + Be(−x2+2αxt−α2t2)
a solution to the wave equation
2y / ∂t2 = v2 (∂2y / ∂x2)

Homework Equations



2y / ∂t2 = v2 (∂2y / ∂x2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have found the solution through finding the partial derivatives (∂2y / ∂t2 and ∂2y / ∂x2) of the function. I got that it is a solution if α=-1 and β=1. However, this was a very long winded process of taking derivatives and am wondering if there is another way to solve it. I notice now that if I put α=-1 and β=1 into the original equation, y(x,t) = Ae(−β2x2−2βxt−t2) + Be(−x2+2αxt−α2t2) , then the exponents are the same. Am I suppose to notice this right away instead of taking the derivatives? Thanks
Yes, you are likely supposed to notice it directly. What is the general form of a solution to the wave equation?
 
Orodruin said:
Yes, you are likely supposed to notice it directly. What is the general form of a solution to the wave equation?

General form is : y(x,t) = Aei(kx-ωt) = A[cos(kx-ωt) + isin(kx-ωt)]

So if I notice the exponents are the same under the condition α=-1 and β=1 how does that exactly translate to it being a solution of the wave equation?
 
No, this is not the most general form. It is just a plane wave solution.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top