Is Your Solution to the Linear Differential Equation Unique?

  • Thread starter Thread starter calvert11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Uniqueness
calvert11
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the IVP. Is your solution unique? Explain.

ty' + (t-2)y = (t^4)*(e^t)

y(0)=0

Homework Equations



Theorem:

If p(t) and g(t) are continuous functions on an open interval a< t < b and the interval contains t0, then there is a unique solution to the IVP on that interval.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm rather sure I've solved the equation correctly, but I end up with something like this:

y = \frac{t^2}{e^t} X [...etc.]

Now if I input the initial values, I get 0 = 0.

Furthermore, since p(t) = (t-2)/t where t cannot = 0, the Theorem would fail as no interval exists that satisfies it.

So, I'm a bit confused about how to answer this question. Assuming I solved the equation correctly, is 0 = 0 a solution? And since the equation fails the Theorem does that mean it is not unique? I do hope I'm making sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
calvert11 said:

Homework Statement


Solve the IVP. Is your solution unique? Explain.

ty' + (t-2)y = (t^4)*(e^t)

y(0)=0

Homework Equations



Theorem:

If p(t) and g(t) are continuous functions on an open interval a< t < b and the interval contains t0, then there is a unique solution to the IVP on that interval.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm rather sure I've solved the equation correctly, but I end up with something like this:

y = \frac{t^2}{e^t} X [...etc.]
This is certainly NOT a solution to the equation. It is an integrating factor for the equation. Is that what you meant?

Now if I input the initial values, I get 0 = 0.

Furthermore, since p(t) = (t-2)/t where t cannot = 0, the Theorem would fail as no interval exists that satisfies it.

So, I'm a bit confused about how to answer this question. Assuming I solved the equation correctly, is 0 = 0 a solution?[/quote]
No, "0= 0" is not a 'solution', it isn't even a function. It is true that y(t)= 0, for all t, is a solution.

And since the equation fails the Theorem does that mean it is not unique? I do hope I'm making sense.
That means it may not be unique. Can you find another function satisfying that differential equation and initial value? Hint: Can you solve that differential equation with y(1)=0. Now, what if you took y(t)= 0 for t< 1 and y(t)= that solution for y> 1?
 
HallsofIvy said:
This is certainly NOT a solution to the equation. It is an integrating factor for the equation. Is that what you meant?

No, I found the integrating factor to be \frac{e^t}{t^2}

No, "0= 0" is not a 'solution', it isn't even a function.
lol yeah. that was a silly question. So would y(0)=0 have no solution then?

Sorry, I'm really unaccustomed to using the layout tools here so please bare with me. This is "in general" what I came up with before putting in the initial values y(0)=0

y = (t^2/e^t)*[...etc. + C] where C is some constant. Obviously 0^2 = 0 so everything in the brackets becomes 0 and since y = 0 then 0 = 0.

That means it may not be unique. Can you find another function satisfying that differential equation and initial value? Hint: Can you solve that differential equation with y(1)=0. Now, what if you took y(t)= 0 for t< 1 and y(t)= that solution for y> 1?
let me try that. but would you mind giving some input on what I've written above?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top