Ising model, Hiblert space, Hamiltonian

newbe318
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Can anyone please explain to me what is the Ising model, Hilbert space, and
Hamiltonian ?

However, please explain it as simple as possible because I am a freshman.

I have looked up all three things. I've tried my best to make some sense of it, but I am, honestly, still confused on what any of it means. I hate to ask silly questions, but What is the purpose of the Ising model, Hilbert space, and Hamiltonian? What are some important details that I should, at the very least, need to take away from learning these topics?

I am researching on an physical review paper and I need help understanding what those three topics mean. Any knowledge or help given on topic to help me better understand is appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
newbe318 said:
What is the purpose of the Ising model, Hilbert space, and Hamiltonian? What are some important details that I should, at the very least, need to take away from learning these topics?

Hilbert spaces and Hamiltonians are the foundation of quantum mechanics, so if you're confused by what they mean then it sounds like you have a pretty significant knowledge gap to understanding something like the Ising model. A Hilbert space is the set of all possible states of quantum system, which together form something you learn about in linear algebra called a vector space. The Hamiltonian determines how a quantum system changes with time. The Ising model is a particular Hamiltonian that is used as a model for understanding ferromagnetism quantum mechanically. Without learning the basics of quantum mechanics first, as one would do in a typical first or second year physics class, I don't really see that understanding a particular application of quantum mechanics like the Ising model is possible. In any case, it doesn't seem like usual freshman material.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Thank you for helping me.

In case you're wondering, yes it doesn't seem like freshman material because my partners are the one who decided to research this topic for our presentation.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top