Isobaric Expansion for Ideal Gas

  • Thread starter Thread starter Windseaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Isobaric
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final temperature of an ideal gas during isobaric expansion from an initial state defined by a pressure of 30 psi, a volume of 2 ft³, and a temperature of 20°C. The pressure remains constant during the expansion, and the final volume is specified as 3 ft³. Participants clarify that the initial state can be used to determine the number of moles, allowing for the application of the ideal gas law to find the final temperature. The relationship between the initial and final states is confirmed using the equation nR = P1V1/T1 = P2V2/T2. This discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the ideal gas law in the context of isobaric processes.
Windseaker
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Given: working fluid is an Ideal gas

P=30 psi
V=2ft3
T=20degreeC

Q. what is initial state of the gas when?

Isobaric expansion to 3ft3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't what they gave you the initial state of the gas?
 
ok finial state--sorry
 
Since the expansion is isobaric, the pressure stayed the same. They also specified the final volume, so all you need is the final Temperature. You already know the initial states for PiVi = nRTi (except for the moles); the final temperature in PfVf = nRTf can be found by setting the moles of the initial state and the moles of the final state equal to each other.
 
I throught is was

PiVi/Ti = P2V2/T2 ?
 
Windseaker said:
I throught is was

PiVi/Ti = P2V2/T2 ?

P1V1 = nRT1
P2V2 = nRT2

nR = P1V1/T1 = P2V2/T2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top