The discussion centers around the challenges of isolating heavy water (D2O) from regular tap water, exploring various methods and the feasibility of such processes. Participants share insights into the density differences, separation techniques, and the practical limitations of extracting heavy water from a typical water source.
Participants express differing views on the feasibility of isolating heavy water from tap water, with some asserting that it is not practical due to low concentrations, while others argue that it is possible to extract measurable amounts, though still challenging.
The discussion reveals limitations in the methods discussed, including the energy consumption of certain processes and the economic viability of alternative methods. The assumptions about the concentration of heavy water in tap water also play a critical role in the feasibility of extraction methods.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_water#ProductionThe HDO may be separated from regular water by distillation or electrolysis and also by various chemical exchange processes, all of which exploit a kinetic isotope effect. (For more information about the isotopic distribution of deuterium in water, see Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water.)
The difference in mass between the two hydrogen isotopes translates into a difference in the zero-point energy and thus into a slight difference in the speed at which the reaction proceeds. Once HDO becomes a significant fraction of the water, heavy water will become more prevalent as water molecules trade hydrogen atoms very frequently. To produce pure heavy water by distillation or electrolysis requires a large cascade of stills or electrolysis chambers, and consumes large amounts of power, so the chemical methods are generally preferred. The most important chemical method is the Girdler sulfide process.
An alternative process[15], patented by Graham M. Keyser, uses lasers to selectively dissociate deuterated hydrofluorocarbons to form deuterium fluoride, which can then be separated by physical means. Although the energy consumption for this process is much less than for the Girdler sulfide process, this method is currently uneconomical due to the expense of procuring the necessary hydrofluorocarbons.
toughsteel said:Problem is there is no meaningful amount heavy water in tap water.