Isometric Transformation Proof Using Matrix Form

  • Thread starter Thread starter matt223
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformation
matt223
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The questions asks for a proof that if a geometrical transformation R on a three dimensional vector space with metric \eta is length preserving, then R^{T}\eta R=\eta. Note that the summation convention is used throughout.

The transformation is given by
x'_{i}=R_{ij}x_{j}

Homework Equations



The length of a vector is determined by the metric according to
l^{2}=\eta _{ij}x_{i}x_{j}

The Attempt at a Solution



If R is length preserving then
l^{2}=\eta _{ij}x_{i}x_{j} =\eta _{ij}x'_{i}x'_{j}
and so
\eta _{ij}x_{i}x_{j}=\eta _{ij}R_{ip}x_{p}R_{jq}x_{q}

My question is how do I get from this stage to the desired relationship R^{T}\eta R=\eta. Perhaps this is already implied by the line above? If so, how?

PS: This is my first post here - thank you for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rearrange the Rs a bit in your expression:

<br /> \eta _{ij}x_{i}x_{j}=\eta _{ij}R_{ip}x_{p}R_{jq}x_{q} = (R_{ip}\eta _{ij}R_{jq})x_{p}x_{q}<br />

and try to rewrite R_{ip}\eta _{ij}R_{jq} in matrix form.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top