Isomorphic between plane and line

  • Thread starter Thread starter hermitian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Plane
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the isomorphism between the open interval (0,1) and the real line \mathbb{R}^1, and whether a similar isomorphism exists between \mathbb{R}^2 and \mathbb{R}^1. It clarifies that isomorphism can refer to different structures, such as set, additive group, or topological space. The consensus is that no topological isomorphism exists between \mathbb{R}^2 and \mathbb{R}^1, supported by a proof involving a subset shaped like the letter Y. However, there are Borel isomorphisms and group homomorphisms between these spaces, but no single map can satisfy both conditions simultaneously.
hermitian
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I understand that the open interval (0,1) is isomorphic to the real line \mathbb{R}^1

May i know whether there is also isomorphism from \mathbb{R}^2 to \mathbb{R}^1

thanks a lot!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by an isomorphism in this case?
 
hmm... the usual sense of isomorphism... where there is a structure preserving bijective map from R^2 to R^1. sorry is my question still vague?
 
The question is which structure are you interested in! It's structure as a set? As an additive group? As a topological space?

I imagine it's the topology you care about. In that case, the answer is "no". The common proof (AFAIK) is to consider the image of a subset of R2 in the shape of the letter Y -- if such an isomorphism existed, it must be injective on the Y. Can you derive a contradiction from that?
 
There is a Borel isomorphism between \mathbb{R}^2 and \mathbb{R}.

There is a group somorphism between \mathbb{R}^2 and \mathbb{R} (both with addition).

BUT: There is no map between \mathbb{R}^2 and \mathbb{R} that is both a Borel isomorphism and a group isomorphism.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top