Isomorphic Matrices: Proving Homomorphisms

  • Thread starter Thread starter kathrynag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving isomorphisms between the complex numbers and a specific subset of matrices, H, consisting of 2x2 real matrices of a certain form. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that the structures and as well as and are isomorphic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to establish one-to-one and onto properties of the mapping function, φ. There are questions about how to define φ and the representation of complex numbers in relation to matrices. Some participants express confusion regarding the definitions and implications of their mappings.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the injectivity and surjectivity of the proposed mappings. Some participants have offered hints about how to approach the proof of one-to-one-ness and onto-ness, while others are grappling with the correct representation of matrices and the implications of their findings. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note difficulties with the notation and representation of matrices, as well as the need to clarify the definitions of the mappings involved. There is also mention of specific formatting issues with LaTeX that may be affecting the clarity of the discussion.

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let H be the subset of [tex]M_{2}(\Re)[/tex] consisting of all matrices of the form
[tex]\left[a[/tex][tex]\right]-b[/tex]
[tex]\left[b[/tex][tex]\right]a[/tex] for a, b elements of the reals.


1. Show that <complex, +> is isomorphic to <H,+>
2. Show that <complex, .> is isomorphic to <H,.>

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, so I need to show one to one and onto.
Then I need to show that [tex]\varphi[/tex](x+y)=[tex]\varphi[/tex](x)+[tex]\varphi[/tex](y)
Ok I'm having problems in what to use for [tex]\varphi[/tex] and I'm not entirely sure I remember matrix addition. Also, how do I define the complex - a+ib or just ib?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're mapping the complex number a + bi to the matrix [tex]\left[ \begin{array}{cc}a & -b\\b & a \end{array} \right][/tex]
 
Citan Uzuki said:
You're mapping the complex number a + bi to the matrix [tex]\left[ \begin{array}{cc}a & -b\\b & a \end{array} \right][/tex]

ok, so I wnat to show one to one and onto.
Then my problem is deifining [tex]\varphi[/tex](x) is it that matrix?
 
What is this "x" you are referring to? Is it a+bi? If so, then yes. Otherwise, no.

Really, you seem to be just pushing symbols around without understanding what they mean.
 
Ok, so [tex]\varphi[/tex] is an isomorphism from <a+bi,+> to H.
So, first I need to show that [tex]\varphi[/tex](x)=[tex]\varphi[/tex](y) to show one to one.
This is where I start to get stuck because of the matrix. What hint would be helpful?
 
No, [itex]\varphi[/itex] is an isomorphism from [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex] to H (or more precisely, an isomorphism from [itex](\mathbb{C},\ +,\ \cdot)[/itex] to [itex](\mathrm{H},\ +,\ \cdot)[/itex]). It satisfies the equation:

[tex]\varphi(a+bi) = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} a & -b \\ b & a \end{array} \right][/tex]

To prove injectivity, note that two matrices are equal iff their corresponding entries are equal, and two complex numbers are equal iff their real and imaginary parts are equal. So represent the complex numbers in terms of their real and imaginary parts (for instance, let one of them be a+bi and the other be c+di). Then show that φ(a+bi) = φ(c+di) implies that a=c and b=d, which in turn implies that a+bi = c+di.
 
Suppose [itex]\varphi(z_1) = \varphi(z_2)[/itex]
[itex]where z_1 = a_1 + b_1 i and z_2 = a_2 + b_2 i[/itex]
Isn't [itex]\varphi(z_1)[/itex] just the matrix with a1 and b1 in the appropriate places?
If so, it's pretty easy to show that z1 = z2 to establish one-to-one-ness.

For onto-ness, just show that for an arbitrary matrix in H, there is a complex number z that maps to it.
 
Ok, so c+di I just switch the points for a=c and b=d
 
ok, so ontoness, is confusing me. I'm just having trouble with finding the arbitrary matrix. So, I could just use the the complex number(a1+ib1)
 
  • #10
Ok, I think I did something wrong for part 2.
I showed one to one by [tex]\varphi[/tex](a+ib)=
[tex]\left[a[/tex][tex]\right]-b[/tex]
[tex]\left[b[/tex][tex]\right]a[/tex]
[tex]\varphi[/tex](c+id)=
[tex]\left[c[/tex][tex]\right]-d[/tex]
[tex]\left[d[/tex][tex]\right]c[/tex]
Then a=b and b=d and this shows one - to one.

Then for onto, I let [tex]\varphi[/tex](a+ib)=
[tex]\left[a[/tex][tex]\right]-b[/tex]
[tex]\left[b[/tex][tex]\right]a[/tex]

Then it's onto H.

So, [tex]\varphi[/tex](xy)=
[tex]\left[xy[/tex][tex]\right]0[/tex]
[tex]\left[0[/tex][tex]\right]xy[/tex]


So, [tex]\varphi[/tex](x)=
[tex]\left[x[/tex][tex]\right]0[/tex]
[tex]\left[0[/tex][tex]\right]x[/tex]


So, [tex]\varphi[/tex](y)=
[tex]\left[y[/tex][tex]\right]0[/tex]
[tex]\left[0[/tex][tex]\right]y[/tex]

My only problem is when doing [tex]\varphi[/tex](x)*[tex]\varphi[/tex](y) it shows that there is not an isomorphism, but I think there should be. Am I going wrong somewhere?
 
  • #11
kathrynag said:
ok, so ontoness, is confusing me. I'm just having trouble with finding the arbitrary matrix. So, I could just use the the complex number(a1+ib1)

Not an arbitrary matrix, but an arbitrary matrix in H, namely
[x -y]
[y x]

Show that there is a complex number that maps to this matrix (easy).
 
  • #12
kathrynag said:
Ok, I think I did something wrong for part 2.
I showed one to one by [tex]\varphi[/tex](a+ib)=
[tex]\left[a[/tex][tex]\right]-b[/tex]
[tex]\left[b[/tex][tex]\right]a[/tex]
[tex]\varphi[/tex](c+id)=
[tex]\left[c[/tex][tex]\right]-d[/tex]
[tex]\left[d[/tex][tex]\right]c[/tex]
Then a=b and b=d and this shows one - to one.
No, for 1-1-ness, you want to show that phi(z1) = phi(z2) ==> z1 = z2. I.e., that a = c and b = d, using your choices for the two complex numbers.

BTW, your latex stuff is coming out pretty screwy.
 
  • #13
Mark44 said:
Not an arbitrary matrix, but an arbitrary matrix in H, namely
[x -y]
[y x]

Show that there is a complex number that maps to this matrix (easy).
Ok so, x+iy

Mark44 said:
No, for 1-1-ness, you want to show that phi(z1) = phi(z2) ==> z1 = z2. I.e., that a = c and b = d, using your choices for the two complex numbers.

BTW, your latex stuff is coming out pretty screwy.
Ok, that makes sense.
Yeah, I'm not sure of the right Latex code for a matrix.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K