Isomorphism between G and Z x Z_2 if G has a normal subgroup isomorphic to Z_2

3029298
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If G contains a normal subgroup H which is isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}_2, and if the corresponding quotient group is infinite cyclic, prove that G is isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}_2

The Attempt at a Solution


G/H is infinite cyclic, this means that any g\{h1,h2\} is generated by some \gamma\{h1,h2\} with \gamma\in G. \gamma=g^n because H is normal. But now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know any general property of a group G such that, when G has this property and N is a normal subgroup of G, you can conclude that G \cong N \times G/N?

(Hint: in the direct product H \times K of two groups, what is the relationship between the subgroups H \times 1 and 1 \times K?)
 
ystael said:
Do you know any general property of a group G such that, when G has this property and N is a normal subgroup of G, you can conclude that G \cong N \times G/N?

(Hint: in the direct product H \times K of two groups, what is the relationship between the subgroups H \times 1 and 1 \times K?)

I do not know any general property of this kind... the subgroups H x 1 and 1 x K only have the identity in common and (H x 1)(1 x K)=H x K, but I do not see how this helps...
 
The "general property of G" I was referring to is "G is abelian". One way to understand the thing that makes direct products special is that the factors commute with each other: in the product above, (h, 1)(1, k) = (1, k)(h, 1) = (h, k).

In your original problem, what happens if G is abelian? What happens if it's not?
 
I really do not understand... what is the use of the fact that the factors of the direct products commute with each other?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top