Isothermal expansion: reversible vs irreversible

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating work done during isothermal expansion of methane under different conditions. For part (a), the work done against a constant external pressure of 30.0 kPa is calculated as 99 J using the formula w = -P dV. In part (b), the need for a different approach arises due to the reversible nature of the expansion, which involves a changing pressure throughout the process. The discussion highlights that isothermal and isobaric conditions cannot coexist, as isothermal implies constant temperature while isobaric implies constant pressure. The reversible process requires calculus to account for the dynamic pressure changes during expansion.
chemboy101
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. A sample of methane of mass 4.5 g occupies 12.7 L at 310 K. Assume that the gas
behaves ideally. (a) Calculate the work done when the gas expands isothermally against a
constant external pressure of 30.0 kPa until its volume has increased by 3.3 L. (b) Calculate the work that would be done if the same expansion occurred isothermally and reversibly




3. I have calulated (a) correctly I think by using w = -P dV to find w = -30 x 3.3 = 99 J.

However for (b) it states that the reaction is reversible. How does this change the equation for work calcuation?

Many thanks
CB
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

(b) also states that the expansion is isothermal, whereas for (a) it was isobaric (constant pressure). For the isothermal expansion, the pressure will drop during the process.
 
chemboy101 said:
1. A sample of methane of mass 4.5 g occupies 12.7 L at 310 K. Assume that the gas
behaves ideally. (a) Calculate the work done when the gas expands isothermally against a constant external pressure of 30.0 kPa until its volume has increased by 3.3 L.
PV=nRT. If a gas expands at constant pressure, the product PV increases so T has to increase (or you have to add more gas, which is not the case here). So it cannot be both isothermal AND isobaric.

So there is a significant initial pressure difference between the gas and the surroundings which decreases as the gas expands. The process is dynamic rather than quasi-static.

In the quasi-static, reversible case, the external pressure is the same as (ie infinitessimally less than) the pressure in the gas at all times. So you will have to do a bit of calculus for part b).

AM
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top