Isothermal increase in pressure of solids

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on expressing work during an isothermal increase in pressure of a solid, particularly using the van der Waals equation. Participants question the appropriateness of this equation for solids, as it is typically applicable to real gases. An alternative empirical equation for solids is suggested, which incorporates temperature and pressure variables. The difficulty in separating dP and dV for integration in the work equation is highlighted. The thread concludes with a commitment to find a suitable expression for work and share findings.
ch1000_man
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How do you express work in an isothermal increase of pressure of a solid in terms of the initial and final pressure?

Homework Equations



van der waals equation

W=Integral of PdV

(P-na/v^2)(v-nb)=nKT

P=pressure
V=volume
n=number of molecules(constant)
T=temperature(constant)

The Attempt at a Solution



d/dV[(P-na/V^2)(V-nb)=nKT]*

The problem here is that dP and dV are very hard to separate so it is hard to substitute dP in W=integral of PdV.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(i) Why are you using the Van der waal equation of state for a solid, as it's usually valid only for real gases?

(ii) From my thermodynamics course, one of the empirical equation of states I used for a solid was

V(p,T) = a +bT +cT^2 - d (p) + e (p T)

where a,b,c,d,e are empirical constants depending on the substance.

This is valid for a fairly wide range of T and P. You should be able to find this in a handbook or a table. (or, http://www.ccl.net/cca/documents/dyoung/topics-orig/eq_state.html" )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was really doubtful using the van der waals equation because most of the problems I encountered used this equation and it just so happened that all of them involved gases though I wasn't sure if van der waals was just limited to real gases. I thought it was a general equation. :)

I tried looking for an equation for solids but I just keep finding the van der waals eqn and the ideal gas eqn.

Anyway thanks, I'll try to use this and find an expression of work and I'll post it here.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top