Isotope fractionation with condensation

AI Thread Summary
Isotope fractionation during condensation can be confusing due to differing interpretations of how heavier and lighter isotopes behave. While heavier isotopes of oxygen may condense first as temperatures drop, lighter isotopes can also condense preferentially due to their higher kinetic energy, leading to more frequent collisions with surfaces. This dual behavior suggests that the conditions of condensation, such as temperature and molecular speed, significantly influence which isotopes condense first. The discussion also touches on the evaporation rates of fayalite compared to forsterite, indicating that the chemical composition affects evaporation dynamics. Understanding these nuances is crucial for grasping isotope behavior in various physical processes.
Puchinita5
Messages
178
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




I'm really confused about this concept. I know that when you evaporate a liquid, heavier isotopes stay behind because it's easier to evaporate lighter isotopes. This is intuitive to me.

I'm confused on the case of condensation because I'm reading two things that seem to contradict each other. In one source, "heavier isotopes of oxygen are selectively precipitated from an air mass as temperature decreases." This seems to be intuitive to me in the same way as evaporation. As temperature decreases, heavier isotopes would condense first.


However, in another source I'm reading, "partial condensation can produce isotopically light condensates" ... I asked my professor about this, and he says that this is because lighter elements are moving faster, so they hit surfaces more often than heavier, so they condense first. It's still intuitive to me to think that heavy isotopes have lower energy so they are just easier to slow down into the condensed state.


Am I missing something? Is there certain situations where heavy things condense first and others where lighter things condense first?




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
And in relation to this topic, why is it that fayalite (iron rich silicate) evaporates faster than forsterite (magnesium rich silicate) from an olivine solid solution?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top