Israel Wilson Perjes Metric: Tetrad Formalism Reference

PhyAmateur
Messages
103
Reaction score
2
Is there any book or reference perhaps on string theory or superstring theory or even advanced general relativity that treats the Israel Wilson Perjes metric using the tetrad formalism in details, i.e, 1-forms and so? (Not spinors methos) I have ran across many papers that just place the spin connection in a very complicated way where factors come out of the blue. I have been trying to understand the twister method and I kind of grasped it but now I want to see how does it work using vielbeins. Please any suggestion would be great!
 
The IWP metric tensor is very simple, it shouldn't be hard for you to compute the spin connection yourself.

Are you unsure in general how to compute the connection 1-forms from the orthonormal basis 1-forms?
 
I did, but calculations get really messy when you want to find the Ricci tensors, that is why I needed a guide to know if I am on the correct track.
 
Oh, I thought you just wanted the spin connections. Calculations always get messy when you want Ricci tensors. :D

Have you done other Ricci tensors by hand? It would definitely help to do a simpler example first. For example, the Gibbons-Hawking metrics are

$$ds^2 = \frac{1}{V} (d\psi + \vec A \cdot d \vec x)^2 + V (dx^2+dy^2+dz^2),$$
where ##V## and ##\vec A## are functions of ##(x,y,z)## only, and

$$\nabla^2 V = 0, \qquad \vec \nabla \times \vec A = \vec \nabla V.$$
Under these conditions, the Ricci tensor should vanish.

If you can do that, then it is a simple matter to generalize to (Euclidean signature) IWP:

$$ds^2 = \frac{1}{V_1V_2} (d\psi + \vec A \cdot d \vec x)^2 + V_1 V_2 (dx^2+dy^2+dz^2),$$
where

$$\nabla^2 V_1 = 0, \qquad \nabla^2 V_2 = 0,\qquad \vec \nabla \times \vec A = V_2 \, \vec \nabla V_1 - V_1 \, \vec \nabla V_2.$$
Under these conditions, the Ricci tensor should again vanish.
 
  • Like
Likes PhyAmateur
By the way, you can find the Ricci tensors of both of these metrics very easily if you first break them up in a few steps. First find how the Ricci tensor is changed by a conformal rescaling:

$$ds^2 = \Omega^2 d\hat{s}^2$$
where ##\Omega## is some function, and you should be able to write ##R_{\mu\nu}## in terms of ##\hat{R}_{\mu\nu}##. This calculation can be done in about a page.

Next do another general calculation:

$$ds_n^2 = (d\psi + A)^2 + ds_{n-1}^2$$
where ##A## is a 1-form that is not a function of ##\psi##. Again you should be able to write ##R_{\mu\nu}^{(n)}## in terms of ##R_{\mu\nu}^{(n-1)}##. This calculation is even easier than the previous one.

Once you have these two formulas, you can combine them in various ways to obtain the Ricci tensors of the previously-mentioned metrics.
 
  • Like
Likes PhyAmateur
Thank you a lot for the nice idea!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top