It shows that V is the dual space of V*?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr.M
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Space
Mr.M
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Not my homework
It's in the textbook - lectures of diff geo by s.s.chern
Just put them down in a clearer way
Could anybody explain the questions in the pic ?
http://x7d.xanga.com/be6d931344030137094065/z100635368.jpg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is only true if V is finite dimensional. Hint just write down bases.
 
actually i don't understand the last step
Phi is taken out of the sum because it is linear in the 2nd variable ?
And "V is the dual space of V*"looks very confusing
The dual space of V is the set linear functions on V
Now the dual space of V* is the set linear functions on V*?
how can i see that ?
 
i just got another idea
since <v,v*> just depends on v*
so we just treat it as a function of v* and then we have the last step ?
 
If V is a finite dimensional vector space, then V the only invariant of V is its dimension. ALL vector spaces of a given dimension (over the same field) are isomorphic. Since V is clearly isomorphic to V* by picking a basis and corresponding dual basis, this shows that (V*)* must be isomorphic to V since they have the same basis. (This fails in infinite dimensions.)

What I presume you're looking at is a 'nice' bijection that sends v in V to the function on V* that sends f to f(v). Notice how an element of v can be sent to a function, call it e_v, and think of it as evaluation at v. This is a linear functional on the space of linear functionals:

e_v(f)=f(v).

This defines a map from V to the space of linear functionals on V*

v--->e_v

it is straight foward to show this is an isomorphism.
 
if f(x) is a number, then f sends x to a number, and x sends f to a number. so f is a function of x, and x is a function of f. so points of the domain are functions on functions.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top