[itex]\int sec(x)tan^{2}(x)[/itex] Can it be integrated w/ U-Sub?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lebombo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function sec(x)tan²(x). Participants explore various methods and rules for integrating trigonometric functions, particularly focusing on the application of identities and substitution techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential to use trigonometric identities and substitution for integration. There is mention of separating terms after applying identities and questioning whether the integration can be straightforward based on established rules.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that while initial approaches may seem straightforward, they lead to more complex integrals that require additional methods, such as integration by parts. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference rules taught by a professor regarding the integration of trigonometric functions, indicating that these rules may have limitations. There is also mention of memorizing certain integrals, which suggests a reliance on prior knowledge in the discussion.

Lebombo
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Last week, the Professor of the class I'm taking jotted down some even and odd exponent rules of thumb to make life easier when integrating various trig functions. Rules like if you have sinx and cosx and one of the trig functions is odd, then split, use an identity and the U-Sub..etc.

My question is: is this a straight forward integration based on the above mentioned type of rules?

\int sec(x)tan^{2}(x) If I replace the tan^{2}x with its identity (sec^{2}x - 1) I end up with sec^{3} again with an additional secx.

This looks more tricky than simply being able to use those rules.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I speak strictly for myself.

When integrating
\int \left[ \sec^3x - \sec x \,\right] dx

Surely you know you can separate the terms into
\int \sec^3x \,dx - \int \sec x \,dx

Now you should memorized the integral of secant x, so that's out of the way.

You could also memorize the integral of secant cubed, which is nicely demonstrated here.

Then you just back-substitute into the second equation.

Seems like a relatively easy way to integrate in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Lebombo said:

Homework Statement





Last week, the Professor of the class I'm taking jotted down some even and odd exponent rules of thumb to make life easier when integrating various trig functions. Rules like if you have sinx and cosx and one of the trig functions is odd, then split, use an identity and the U-Sub..etc.

My question is: is this a straight forward integration based on the above mentioned type of rules?

\int sec(x)tan^{2}(x)


If I replace the tan^{2}x with its identity (sec^{2}x - 1) I end up with sec^{3} again with an additional secx.

This looks more tricky than simply being able to use those rules.
Those rules only work to a certain point. Eventually you get an integral you have to evaluate using other methods, and the integral of ##\sec^3 x## is one of those. Use integration by parts to calculate that one.

You could also forgo the initial use of a trig substitution and evaluate the original integral using integration by parts.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you ReneG and Vela.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K