Jacobian transformation problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the transformation of a complex integral involving variables α and β into a new form with variables x and y using a Jacobian transformation. The original integral is expressed in terms of α and β, while the transformed integral uses the substitutions α = xy and β = x(1-y). The user struggles with correctly applying the Jacobian to change the variables and integrate, as their attempts lead to a complicated expression rather than the desired result. They seek clarification on the proper method for performing this transformation. The thread highlights the importance of understanding Jacobian transformations in multivariable integrals.
vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I feel so stupid for asking this question, but I want to understand how this integral:

\int^{\infty}_{0}d\alpha \int^{\infty}_{0} d\beta \frac{i}{[4 \pi i(\alpha + \beta)]^\frac{D}{2}} e^{[i \frac{\alpha\beta}{\alpha + \beta}p^2 - i(\alpha + \beta)m^2]}

can be transformed into this:

\int^{\infty}_{0}dx \int^{1}_{0} dy \frac{1}{[4 \pi i x]^\frac{D}{2}} e^{[-i x (m^2 -y(1-y)p^2)}

The change of variables are:

\alpha =xy
\beta = x(1-y)

My question is both these equations are in terms of two variables and I have never come across how to do this kind of integral. I am guessing that we just to substitute:

d\alpha =xdy+ydx

and

d\beta = (1-y)dx -xdy

into the original integral.

However, if I do this, I don't get the second expression... I get something quite messy.

Can anyone shed any light on this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
http://www.maths.abdn.ac.uk/~igc/tch/ma2001/notes/node77.html

The above (Jacobian transformation) describes how the transformation is supposed to take place.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


thanks mathman:)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
952
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top