Jacobian transformation problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the Jacobian transformation to find a surface defined by four boundary curves: xy = 4, xy = 8, y = 5x, and y = 15x. The transformation used is u = xy and v = y/x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the bounds for the transformed variables u and v, with some expressing confusion about the negative ranges for v and the implications of the transformation's injectivity. There are attempts to clarify the reasoning behind only considering positive values for v and the significance of the functions being odd.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the implications of the transformation and discussing the integration process. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of odd functions and the correct interpretation of the integral, but there remains uncertainty about the treatment of negative regions and the overall approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential constraints related to the transformation not being injective and the implications of integrating over certain ranges. Participants are also considering the effects of drawing the functions to better understand the problem setup.

oferon123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find surface inside four boundary curves:
[itex]xy = 4 , xy=8 , y=5x , y=15x[/itex]
using the transformation: [itex]u=xy , v=\frac{y}{x}[/itex]

Homework Equations


I'm getting the new bounds to be:
[itex]4 < u < 8[/itex] , [itex]-15 < v < -5[/itex] OR [itex]5 < v < 15[/itex]
Jacobian is [itex]\frac{1}{2v}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



After integration i get [itex]0.5*ln(v)[/itex] which I can't put -15 nor -5 in it..
On the solution they gave us, they completely ignore the surface at x,y < 0 and go only for 5 < v < 15 , which I assume is only relevant for the surface at x,y > 0...
As if they calculated only the half of the area.
I understand all I need to do is double this area, but where am I going wrong?
I attach this sketch I've drawn trying to understand what's going on:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
They make use of the oddness of all four functions provided to calculate only one of those areas and then double the result.
 
Yes, I do understand that.
However I don't understand how your'e supposed to see that unless you draw everything.
More important - even if I do draw it, I don't understand why I get stuck with the method and can't integrate over -15 < v < -5
I obviously do something wrong if I can't, the question is what

Maybe it's got something to do with the transformation not being injective?
 
Note that for [itex]x<0[/itex] you have
[tex]\int \mathrm{d}x \frac{1}{x}=\ln(-x)+\text{const}.[/tex]
 
Honestly, it is not too hard to see that those functions are odd - I spotted it before even looking at your sketch of the functions. A function is odd if it satisfies [itex]f(-x) = -f(x)[/itex]. You can check that without drawing anything.

On your mistake, you seem to be missing a very simple fact: [itex]\displaystyle \int \frac{dx}{x} \neq \log(x) + C[/itex], but instead, [itex]\displaystyle \int \frac{dx}{x} = \log|x| + C[/itex].
 
Oh your'e right, thanks a lot!

But now I have this new question I asked..
If this transformation is not injective, how come it works?
for example: for x=-1, y=-1 and x=1 y=1 we get the same v=1

Thanks again!
 
oferon123 said:
[itex]4 < u < 8[/itex] , [itex]-15 < v < -5[/itex] OR [itex]5 < v < 15[/itex]
I don't understand how you get -15 < v < -5. In both regions, x and y have the same sign, so u and v are always positive.
 
I tried to play with [itex]u=xy , v=\frac{y}{x}[/itex] a little and that's what i got.
If I'm wrong then where is the negative region in xy is transformed to in uv region?
The way I drew it - one goes to the upper square at uv, and the other goes to lower square.. Is it not?
 
What haruspex is saying is that you can't get negative values for u and v in the regions you want to find the area for. Negative values would show up in the second and the fourth quadrants, but not in the first and the third; and you don't have the curves [itex]xy = c[/itex] for c constant in those quadrants. It will still give the correct answer though, because it just happens to integrate into the same thing; albeit out of luck.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K