georgiworld
- 22
- 0
Very interesting compilation of webcam images synchronized and timed.
Last edited by a moderator:
georgiworld said:Thank you for the great, well-organized site. Are you the author?
For Unit 1, the METI/NISA-JNES presentation indicates injection of water through the fire extinguisher system and water sprayed by truck. It's not clear that is still the case, but perhaps they lost the cooling system in Unit 1.|Fred said:How do they inject water into 1 and 2 pool ?
There is a vertical structure linking the floors : the lift( and likely a staircase) could it play a role in the lower floor damages ?
Astronuc said:For Unit 1, the METI/NISA-JNES presentation indicates injection of water through the fire extinguisher system and water sprayed by truck. It's not clear that is still the case, but perhaps they lost the cooling system in Unit 1.
In Unit 2, they are using a motor operated pump with water from the fire extinguishing system.
There could be leaking water over the floor or through any cracks that might have occurred in the SFP steel liner and concrete structure.
|Fred said:I don't really get you are you saying they are or aren't roof structure south of u 3? I seen some, I also see deformation of the metallic roof structure on the north suggesting the infamous FHM did its do
Krikkosnack said:Tetsuo Jimbo, founder of Video News Network, a TV broadcasting website, and a colleague ventured into the area on Sunday. Before setting out, Mr. Jimbo consulted a radiation expert, who advised he spend a maximum of two hours in the zone. The 49-year-old journalist stayed for two and a half. A face mask -- the kind worn to fend off hay fever -- was his only protective gear. He admits he and his colleague got "kind of scared" when a host of large dump trucks drove by and the drivers were covered in what looked like "full radiation-proof suits" and gas masks.
Not that I'm aware of.WhoWee said:Has the required (replacement) flow rate of water been posted?
TCups said:Hope someone can find the live Fukushima video of the current 7.4 quake and tsunami expected to hit about now.
Taxidermista said:This last 7.1 quake happened only 12 miles away from Onagawa nuclear plant.
7.1 2011/04/07 14:32:42 38.253 141.640 49.0 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
NISA: Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant started emergency power generator, 1 external power-line left, so continue to cooling the fuel rod down
artax said:good work
NUCENG said:Your scenario has three complications.
41 miles out to sea from Sendai.Taxidermista said:This last 7.1 quake happened only 12 miles away from Onagawa nuclear plant.
7.1 2011/04/07 14:32:42 38.253 141.640 49.0 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
NISA: Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant started emergency power generator, 1 external power-line left, so continue to cooling the fuel rod down
jensjakob said:<sarcasm>Wouldnt TEPCO report that?</sarcasm>
Seriously - TEPCO has no possible way to state anything about the effect of the quake, since they don't have access to large parts of the plant due to radiation.
They can claim "Not identified any immediate damage in the areas that we can monitor".
But it is not valid to say "no additional damage", sorry
georgiworld said:Thank you for the great, well-organized site. Are you the author?
Primary Containment
Damage suspected (NISA, TEPCO) "Not damaged" (JAIF 10:003/25); Fuel pool is heating up but is adequately cooled, and fuel may have been ejected from the pool
(based on information from TEPCO of neutron sources found up to 1 mile from the units, and
very high dose rate material that had to be bulldozed over between Units 3 and 4. It is also
possible the material could have come from Unit 4);
ASSUMPTIONS: Rad Levels: DW 5100 R/hr, torus 150 R/hr (Industry); 100 R/hr debris outside Rx
building (covered).
Jakeh said:If that's the case (and it may be), it is not a bit surprising that (a) the sound effects person added in all the rumbling noises as well as the dramatic bangs and (b) counterintuitively chose to add 3 bangs rather 1 or perhaps 2.
The sound may have been traveling a much more direct route to the mike than you experienced in those London bombs. Unless you were on top of Hampstead Heath or Crystal Palace (or the like) at the time, there would have been a lot more reflection/muffling etc from buildings between the explosions and your ears.
Someone earlier cited the timing as proof the sound was artificial. That isn't exactly proof - if the timing is off, the soundtrack may just have been shifted in time against the video so the sound was a closer match to the picture for TV purposes.