JK Master-Slave Flip-Flop timing diagram

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonHathaway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 6K views
JasonHathaway
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Draw the output Q of the JK Master-Slave Flip-Flop

Homework Equations


Master works at the rising edge, while and the Slave works at the falling edge.

The Attempt at a Solution



http://s13.postimg.org/j5ldpmw9i/20150109_095656.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JasonHathaway said:

Homework Statement


Draw the output Q of the JK Master-Slave Flip-Flop

Homework Equations


Master works at the rising edge, while and the Slave works at the falling edge.

The Attempt at a Solution



http://s13.postimg.org/j5ldpmw9i/20150109_095656.jpg

Could you post the schematic for the J/K M/S flipflop you are using for this problem please? Thanks. :)

EDIT -- And were you given the J & K waveforms as part of the problem statement?
 
The first part is OK. (Q is not defined by the inputs before clk 1 falling edge). The master is at J=1, K=0 which on that edge is transferred to the slave, so Q1 = 1 upon the falling edge of clk1.

The J input at the falling edge of clk3 should not coincide with that clock edge. There needs to be a minimum setup time on J before that edge occurs. However, assuming J is still high when the clk3 edge occurs, that Q wavform is also correct (toggle action).

The same problem obtains at the falling edge of clk5. What did the master latch?

Bottom line: inputs must be stabilized at least several ns before a clock falling edge. This is the only timing requirement for a master-slave FF. Timing of the inputs is not important for the rising edge of any clock pulse since the master FF output is immaterial until the clk drops.
 
Last edited:
After closer scrutiny, I agree with rude man. JasonHathaway's sketch of waveforms is correct. (I'd forgotten that for the Master, it's not "edge triggered" as such. Level triggered would be more accurate.) The question of JK inputs changing coincident with the fall of the clock pulse is also a caution that should be heeded.

However, none of us is correct if the gating arrangement in the linked .gif is used, because it interposes an inversion between the Master and the Slave.
 
Last edited:
NascentOxygen said:
After closer scrutiny, I agree with rude man. JasonHathaway's sketch of waveforms is correct. (I'd forgotten that for the Master, it's not "edge triggered" as such. Level triggered would be more accurate.) The question of JK inputs changing coincident with the fall of the clock pulse is also a caution that should be heeded.

However, none of us is correct if the gating arrangement in the linked .gif is used, because it interposes an inversion between the Master and the Slave.
Probably a typo on the master FF outputs. Should look same as the slave.
In any case, the OP's schematic is inadequate. The circuit should be shown in terms of gates; see attached.
 

Attachments