Joint Calculation for Truss Reactions: r, m, and j in Truss Members

  • Thread starter Thread starter chetzread
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Joints
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of joints (j), reactions (r), and truss members (m) in a truss system. The user questions the accuracy of their joint calculations, specifically suggesting that j should equal 9 for part d and 14 for part e. There is a mention of the x braces potentially not being connected at their intersection, which could affect the analysis. However, it is noted that the brace forces remain consistent, so those joints do not need to be counted for determining degree of indeterminacy. The example provided is criticized for not being well-chosen.
chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


in the notes, r =number of reactions, m = number of truss members , j = number of joints
i suspect that the j for d and e are wrong...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have circled the joints and calculated them, for d , j= 9,
for part e , it should be j= 14,
Am I right?[/B]
 

Attachments

  • 330.jpg
    330.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 407
Physics news on Phys.org
The x braces might or might not be connected where they cross, although usually connecting them helps out of plane bucking for compression members. Either way, the brace forces are the same, so you need not count those joints when determining degree of indeterminacy. The author didn't pick a good example in my opinion.
 
Back
Top