MHB Joint Probability of Independent Events

Subliminal1
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'd like someone to double check my maths please, it wasn't the greatest at school and that was a few years ago!
If I am incorrect could you please tell me the correct answer as well as show me how to apply it so I can figure out similar problems myself. Thanks.

Yes, this is about Pokémon, but there is a lot of maths involved. Here goes:

PROBLEM 1:
For a Pokemon to be "shiny" the odds are 1/273 encounters.
Each encounter has the chance for "Pokemon A" to appear of 60% OR"Pokemon B" to appear of 40%.

The odds of having Pokemon A appear shiny are 1/455
I multiplied 1/273 by 6/10 to result in 1/455.
The odds of having Pokemon B appear shiny are 2/1365
I multiplied 1/273 by 4/10 to result in 2/1365.

PROBLEM 2:
For a Pokemon to be shiny the odds are 1/273 encounters.
5 Pokemon appear in each encounter and always 5, never more, never less. Each has the same odds of being shiny.

The chance that two Pokemon will be shiny in a single encounter are 1/74529
I squared/ multiplied by the power of 2, 273 to result in 1/74529

Applying this maths, the chance of all 5 to be shiny will be 273 to the power of 5?

PROBLEM 3:
I am unsure how to work this one out.
For a Pokemon to be shiny the odds are 1/273 encounters.
Each encounter has the chance for Pokemon A to appear of 60% OR Pokemon B to appear of 40%.
Pokemon A and B both have a 50% chance to be MALE and 50% chance to be FEMALE.

What are the chances of encountering a FEMALE Shiny Pokemon A?

Please let me know if my maths is correct, if it isn't please correct me and show me how to apply it too.

Many thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Subliminal said:
Hello,
I'd like someone to double check my maths please, it wasn't the greatest at school and that was a few years ago!
If I am incorrect could you please tell me the correct answer as well as show me how to apply it so I can figure out similar problems myself. Thanks.

Yes, this is about Pokémon, but there is a lot of maths involved. Here goes:

PROBLEM 1:
For a Pokemon to be "shiny" the odds are 1/273 encounters.
Each encounter has the chance for "Pokemon A" to appear of 60% OR"Pokemon B" to appear of 40%.

The odds of having Pokemon A appear shiny are 1/455
I multiplied 1/273 by 6/10 to result in 1/455.
The odds of having Pokemon B appear shiny are 2/1365
I multiplied 1/273 by 4/10 to result in 2/1365.

PROBLEM 2:
For a Pokemon to be shiny the odds are 1/273 encounters.
5 Pokemon appear in each encounter and always 5, never more, never less. Each has the same odds of being shiny.

The chance that two Pokemon will be shiny in a single encounter are 1/74529
I squared/ multiplied by the power of 2, 273 to result in 1/74529

Applying this maths, the chance of all 5 to be shiny will be 273 to the power of 5?

PROBLEM 3:
I am unsure how to work this one out.
For a Pokemon to be shiny the odds are 1/273 encounters.
Each encounter has the chance for Pokemon A to appear of 60% OR Pokemon B to appear of 40%.
Pokemon A and B both have a 50% chance to be MALE and 50% chance to be FEMALE.

What are the chances of encountering a FEMALE Shiny Pokemon A?

Please let me know if my maths is correct, if it isn't please correct me and show me how to apply it too.

Many thanks!

Hi Subliminal,

Considering each Pokemon is created independently from others your math is correct. For more information on why this works refer >>this<<. For the last question, the probability that the Pokemon is female is $\frac{1}{2}$, the probability that A appears is $\frac{60}{100}$ and the probability that it is shiny is, $\frac{1}{273}$. Considering these three events as independent the joint probability is, $\frac{1}{2}\times\frac{60}{100}\times\frac{1}{273}$.
 
Hi Sudharaka,

I'm glad all those years at school actually got through to me - so "that" is what school is for!

But seriously, thank you for your reply so soon, it was well explained also.

Cheers
John/ Sub
 
Subliminal said:
Hi Sudharaka,

I'm glad all those years at school actually got through to me - so "that" is what school is for!

But seriously, thank you for your reply so soon, it was well explained also.

Cheers
John/ Sub

You are very welcome. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top